This is crossing a very bad line, and is absolutely unacceptable. My company of about 50 people on G-Suite will be canceling our subscription and moving to Office 365 within the next three months. We had discussed it in the past due to their history of flagrant disregard for the security and privacy standards we require, but this has galvanized the conversation and we're prioritizing it on the near-term now. I'm sure…
Google is now applying its coronavirus misinformation policies to personal files
21–30 of 229 posts
Re: Google is now applying its coronavirus misinformation policies to personal files
#22This headline is very misleading. They didn't delete the file from the user's Google Drive - they disabled public sharing for the file.
Re: Google is now applying its coronavirus misinformation policies to personal files
#23This headline is very misleading. They didn't delete the file from the user's Google Drive - they disabled public sharing for the file.
To quote a popular politician “what difference does it make ?”
When a file is privately stored and accessible only to you, Google doesn't have to know or care what's inside it.
Re: Google is now applying its coronavirus misinformation policies to personal files
#24Re: Google is now applying its coronavirus misinformation policies to personal files
#25It's 1984 in 2020 all over again. Paging Mr. Orwell...
All of the big file hosting platforms have long had copyright and child porn content filters. The fact that they are policing ToS violations (presumably only after they are reported or scripting re-violations) doesn't seem anywhere near 1984-style censorship.
I do fear that this will give the tin foil hats more conviction that "there's something to it since they are hiding it!" and not more motivation to be skeptical of this particular thread of inquiry about the pandemic.
Re: Google is now applying its coronavirus misinformation policies to personal files
#26Re: Google is now applying its coronavirus misinformation policies to personal files
#27Further proof that when you upload a file to Google Drive, you don’t own that file, they do
You are overloading the term "own" and your use of "that file" is ambiguous. You "own" (in many senses) the local copy of the uploaded file. You only lease the space and hosting for the remote copy, assuming you pay your bill and abide by the contract. My coworker overflowed his Google Drive quota and learned that lesson the hard way.
Re: Google is now applying its coronavirus misinformation policies to personal files
#28Re: Google is now applying its coronavirus misinformation policies to personal files
#29This is crossing a very bad line, and is absolutely unacceptable. My company of about 50 people on G-Suite will be canceling our subscription and moving to Office 365 within the next three months. We had discussed it in the past due to their history of flagrant disregard for the security and privacy standards we require, but this has galvanized the conversation and we're prioritizing it on the near-term now. I'm sure…
Google didn't delete anyone's files, and even then some responsibility already falls on them just for hosting your content. If Google were part of distribution, that would be a separate wrongdoing in the eyes of the public.
Google does not have the luxury of a government institution to which it may delegate all difficult questions of institutional responsibility (unlike the FDA or the FCC, both government organizations where companies may delegate responsibility), thus putting the pressure on Google to exercise oracle-like vision.
Re: Google is now applying its coronavirus misinformation policies to personal files
#30Looks like they are flexing all the work done for Project Dragonfly. Waste not, want not.