Earlier quoted context omitted.
And many underdeveloped too: https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/... 2 countries have less than 1 kid per woman 114 countries have less than 2 62 countries have less than 3 (20 of which are at less than 2.2) 21 countries have less than 4 18 countries have less than 5 11 countries have less than 6 Of the largest 6 (half the world's population): China has 1.6, India 2.3, US 1.8, Indonesia 2.0, P…
Then how is human population still skyrocketing?
Mount Everest is visible from Kathmandu for first time in living memory
161–170 of 283 posts
Re: Mount Everest is visible from Kathmandu for first time in living memory
#162Earlier quoted context omitted.
Vitamin-D deficiency may cause severe covid-19, or severe covid-19 may cause vitamin-D deficiency (covid-19 affects the kidneys second worst after lungs it seems, and you need kidneys for vitamin-D processing), or a little bit of both. Which one it is, is not yet known.
Vitamin D is fat soluble and “buffered” in the body; all of which is to say that no one goes from good vitamin D levels to being vitamin D deficient in the time it takes to get infected and develop serious Covid-19 symptoms.
Vitamin-D2 aka ergocalciferol works similar in that is is eventually converted by liver and kidneys into calcitriol.
Ergocalciferol, calcifediol and it's various precursors can indeed be stored in fat tissue.
It is unclear however how severe covid-19 can affect the kidney and liver functions relating to this and release of substances from fat tissue.
Right now a lot of research seems to point in the direction that vitamin-D deficiency can indeed lead to more severe covid-19. At the same time there is different research suggesting that covid-19 itself messes with vitamin-D levels as well.
Re: Mount Everest is visible from Kathmandu for first time in living memory
#163Earlier quoted context omitted.
It could have been non-polluting, but instead of redesigning, it's easier now to get nations to compete against each other for the location of that plant - and as part of that competition, relax the environmental protections. The "freedom of movement" for corporations (freedom of movement of capital?) has plenty of benefits, but this is one of the negative side effects.
My solution is for all governments to take responsibility, tax pollution and for consumers to understand the environmental costs of products, possibly by forcing disclosure. I don't understand what your solution is. Ban importing goods? Tax imported goods based on factory pollution and standards?
Re: Mount Everest is visible from Kathmandu for first time in living memory
#164Earlier quoted context omitted.
Every time I see discussions like this I never see thoughts on what to do with all those animals. What do you do with the 70B animals we're no longer consuming?
Continue eating them as usual but stop breeding new ones. Most of them only live a few months, they'll all be gone within two years. The species won't go extinct either, we can still keep some around in their natural habitats and zoos, which are both much nicer conditions than most farms. Preferably we won't keep around the breeds that were created for farming, they just aren't healthy animals.
The next quandaries are what do farm owners, farm workers, slaughterhouses, tanners, textiles, feed companies, agriculture focused veterinarian services and products, etc, do now that they're no longer needed?
Re: Mount Everest is visible from Kathmandu for first time in living memory
#165> It is known for a sunrise view of the Himalayas including Mount Everest as well as other peaks of the Himalayan range of eastern Nepal. Nagarkot also offers a panoramic view of the Kathmandu Valley.
Re: Mount Everest is visible from Kathmandu for first time in living memory
#166Earlier quoted context omitted.
So you're taking steps and not having children then?
Correct. I’m 46 years old, healthy, fertile, heterosexual and I don’t have any kids. How about you?
Re: Mount Everest is visible from Kathmandu for first time in living memory
#167Earlier quoted context omitted.
Unfortunately, it looks like this will be short-lived. China's emissions for some pollutants are already above what they were pre-shutdown. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-china-...
Oh, F*ck :( Greedy human race Signed: bleeding coral reef with sad penguin
(using the word 'terrorism' because that's how it will be labelled by media and government, no matter the scope)
Re: Mount Everest is visible from Kathmandu for first time in living memory
#168It's amazing and wonderful how much environmental damage seems to be recovering. Air pollution is down, carbon emissions are down as much as 17%, fish and sharks are repopulating shorelines and beaches - and to think, all it took was the most severe public health crisis in 100 years, a catastrophic global recession, and an overpowering wave of human misery and death
Re: Mount Everest is visible from Kathmandu for first time in living memory
#169Earlier quoted context omitted.
Another point to balance the "how much environmental damage seems to be recovering": CO2 in the atmosphere has a long inertia. The (reduction of) emissions in the past few months will not have any effect on the global warming for a few decades. Basically in the short/mid-term, CO2 emissions are accumulated to previous emissions, not replacing them
This only shows that, while CO₂ concentrations are the dominant control variable in the question of our long-term survival, the overall health of the environment is influenced by many, many more things, especially short-term. Now it is especially clear that protecting the environment and mitigating the climate crisis are two different, and only partially aligned efforts. Frequently, they're in opposition - which is w…
I wish more people understood this. Too many times conversation are hijacked by the CO2 discussion when really in the short term we should be focusing 99% of our efforts on bio-diversity preservation.
Re: Mount Everest is visible from Kathmandu for first time in living memory
#170Earlier quoted context omitted.
>Every time I see discussions like this I never see thoughts on what to do with all those animals. [until the aliens bring tomorrow the mass production lines of cheap lab meat] Because of naturally gradual process of lab meat quality increase and price decrease there will be no point in time when suddenly "we have 70B animals we're no longer consuming "
>Once we finally have artificial meat and thus stop killing sentient beings... But that's literally in your scenario. If you don't have an answer, that's fine, because all of this is idealism. I just never see any conversation pertaining to what we do with all the animals. It seems like it comes down to a substantial culling, as letting them loose would be disastrous for a few obvious reasons.