Makes sense. The fed's inflated the money supply quite a lot.
This isn’t just about a money printer.
11–20 of 156 posts
Makes sense. The fed's inflated the money supply quite a lot.
This isn’t just about a money printer.
I really can't fathom how this is possible. The largely young demographic (which I'm guessing warrants this valuation) has a track record of jumping from platform to platform, whichever is trendy for a given year. With that in mind, how are investors seriously willing to get behind this company in such a big way?
I really can't fathom how this is possible. The largely young demographic (which I'm guessing warrants this valuation) has a track record of jumping from platform to platform, whichever is trendy for a given year. With that in mind, how are investors seriously willing to get behind this company in such a big way?
I really can't fathom how this is possible. The largely young demographic (which I'm guessing warrants this valuation) has a track record of jumping from platform to platform, whichever is trendy for a given year. With that in mind, how are investors seriously willing to get behind this company in such a big way?
do they really though? It honestly seems like particular brands are very sticky with internet demographics, not just young people.
IIRC there even is more brand loyalty among ecommerce than there is among physical brick and mortar stores.
You can look at something like Whatsapp as well. There have been lots of privacy concerns after the acquisition by Facebook but the number of people who actually switch to say, Signal is very low. There are huge network effects to these social media / communications platforms, and TikTok already has 1.5 billion users worldwide.
If this came true, what would be the ramifications for US national security?
I really can't fathom how this is possible. The largely young demographic (which I'm guessing warrants this valuation) has a track record of jumping from platform to platform, whichever is trendy for a given year. With that in mind, how are investors seriously willing to get behind this company in such a big way?
Can someone explain to me the rationale behind such an aggressive employee headcount? Do they have larger ambitions or are they trying to justify the valuation? It just strikes me at an incredibly large number of employees for the service.
I really can't fathom how this is possible. The largely young demographic (which I'm guessing warrants this valuation) has a track record of jumping from platform to platform, whichever is trendy for a given year. With that in mind, how are investors seriously willing to get behind this company in such a big way?
I really can't fathom how this is possible. The largely young demographic (which I'm guessing warrants this valuation) has a track record of jumping from platform to platform, whichever is trendy for a given year. With that in mind, how are investors seriously willing to get behind this company in such a big way?