Mediasoup – WebRTC video conferencing
github.com
Mediasoup – WebRTC video conferencing
1–10 of 49 posts
Re: Mediasoup – WebRTC video conferencing
#2Re: Mediasoup – WebRTC video conferencing
#3What kind of hardware would I need to setup this to run a private video chat server for say 10 users?
Re: Mediasoup – WebRTC video conferencing
#4What kind of hardware would I need to setup this to run a private video chat server for say 10 users?
Re: Mediasoup – WebRTC video conferencing
#5What kind of hardware would I need to setup this to run a private video chat server for say 10 users?
What advantages would this offer over jitsi meet?
Mediasoup has a bit more modern codebase and offers a rather low-level framework to build your own SFU. Whereas Jitsi videobridge is more of a ready-to-go SFU, but less flexible.
Mediasoup has very good node bindings, which may or may not be an advantage to you.
They offer similar (good) performance, although Mediasoup has a slight edge here. They're both very actively being kept up to date with the latest standards (in contrast with Kurento which is now as good as dead after Twilio bought the team). This is very important since both the spec and browser implementations are a fast moving target.
Disadvantage of mediasoup is that it is mainly maintained by just 1 or 2 persons and not yet used as much as Jitsi, so it's a bit of a gamble to start building your product on top of that.
Re: Mediasoup – WebRTC video conferencing
#6What kind of hardware would I need to setup this to run a private video chat server for say 10 users?
What advantages would this offer over jitsi meet?
mediasouop is not an application but a set of server and client low level libraries to build whichever kind of audio/video applications (not just meetings). You don't "install mediasoup and configure it". You create your Node app and integrate mediasoup as you do with any other NPM dependency. Same in client side. More here:
https://mediasoup.org/documentation/overview/
Of course, this means that you must build your application, including UI, client-server signaling, etc etc.
Re: Mediasoup – WebRTC video conferencing
#7Earlier quoted context omitted.
What advantages would this offer over jitsi meet?
Jitsi meet is a conferencing app. You likely mean jitsi videobridge. That's the SFU part and comparable to mediasoup. Mediasoup has a bit more modern codebase and offers a rather low-level framework to build your own SFU. Whereas Jitsi videobridge is more of a ready-to-go SFU, but less flexible. Mediasoup has very good node bindings, which may or may not be an advantage to you. They offer similar (good) performance,…
Re: Mediasoup – WebRTC video conferencing
#8Edit : I see Kurento is now assumed dead thanks to Twilio buying them, and I understand Janus doesn't provide any client libraries.
Re: Mediasoup – WebRTC video conferencing
#9The demo is nice and clean. How does this compare to Kurento, or Janus? Edit : I see Kurento is now assumed dead thanks to Twilio buying them, and I understand Janus doesn't provide any client libraries.
Kurento still the easiest to deploy I think. Used in OpenVidu.
Re: Mediasoup – WebRTC video conferencing
#10The demo is nice and clean. How does this compare to Kurento, or Janus? Edit : I see Kurento is now assumed dead thanks to Twilio buying them, and I understand Janus doesn't provide any client libraries.
mediasoup overview here: https://mediasoup.org/documentation/overview/