I've never lived in China but this immediately sounds like my (naive) idea of what it must be like: you're only allowed to consume what the government has approved. I think this is setting a dangerous precedence.
Except in this case it's not the government, but private corporations taking some kind of political stance. Google in particular has been very "active," not to forget also: https://www.businessinsider.com/youtube-will-ban-anything-ag... ("video that 'goes against' WHO guidance on the pandemic will be blocked")
Google bans Podcast Addict app over non-approved Covid-19 content
81–90 of 577 posts
Re: Google bans Podcast Addict app over non-approved Covid-19 content
#82My favorite (and only) podcasting app. I hope someone who works at Google reads this and flag it internally. This quote really sums up how ridiculous Google is being: > What Google is asking of Podcast Addict would be comparable to Google asking a web browser app to remove references to all the websites and social media posts that reference the coronavirus unless the reference comes from an official government entity…
> asking a web browser app to remove references to all the websites and social media posts Except usually a web browser doesn't include a index of sites, You go to a another site (Google/Bing) for that. If a browser does include "recommended sites" the landing pages of those sites best keep to Google's and Apples rules. For an extreme example, If Firefox was promoting PornHub on the new tab page we could understand w…
It's beyond fucked up what Google is doing.
Re: Google bans Podcast Addict app over non-approved Covid-19 content
#83Governments in general seem to be lagging hard behind advances on the net. More and more power is ending up in the hands of companies.
Re: Google bans Podcast Addict app over non-approved Covid-19 content
#84Re: Google bans Podcast Addict app over non-approved Covid-19 content
#85> In order to get the app restored, Google is asking Guillemane to remove references to COVID-19 and keywords related to COVID-19 from the app. So is this a metadata issue, or a content issue?
Why does a general use podcast app have covid in its search keywords? Scumbag marketing tactic; kudos to google if that’s all this is over.
Re: Google bans Podcast Addict app over non-approved Covid-19 content
#86So Reddit has /r/conspiracy that can be accessed through the app, should that be removed?
Re: Google bans Podcast Addict app over non-approved Covid-19 content
#87Because it makes a ton of sense to move music to YouTube music, but the podcasts to something entirely different.
They're blindly stumbling around making sure the public will think they're pretty deserving of any and all antitrust hammers than swing their way in the near future.
Re: Google bans Podcast Addict app over non-approved Covid-19 content
#88I've never lived in China but this immediately sounds like my (naive) idea of what it must be like: you're only allowed to consume what the government has approved. I think this is setting a dangerous precedence.
Re: Google bans Podcast Addict app over non-approved Covid-19 content
#89Earlier quoted context omitted.
I agree. It’s badly affected air travel and who knows what changes will result (or what contracts for pointless bio-security theatre have been made) In the UK, a 300+ page law was basically pre-written and enacted very quickly, reminiscent of the early anti terrorism law. We have set up a bio security unit, currently headed by the security services. UK has a “threat level” system for coronavirus similar to the terror…
Do you think it's unjustified? Other countries have acted much more quickly and saved lots of lives.
Re: Google bans Podcast Addict app over non-approved Covid-19 content
#90Wow, obviously an oversight. Pretty sure Google does not want search tools to be responsible for the content of the results they surface...
this is google's mantra these days. do they do anything well anymore?