Live data from Hacker News

It’s Time to Get Back to RSS

danielmiessler.com

271–280 of 376 posts

Re: It’s Time to Get Back to RSS

#271
The main drawback of RSS IMHO is that it's strictly one-way publishing. You can't comment, or like, or subscribe, or share, or sponsor directly to original author. Author might posted something really exiting and seen none of the reactions happening in all kinds of RSS readers.

I think it's important if we can have a universal two-way format for long, rich written texts.

Re: It’s Time to Get Back to RSS

#272

If self-hosted is your thing I highly recommend tiny-rss and the iOS app accompanying it. https://tt-rss.org/

You mean Android app? There's no official iOS app. A decent iOS alternative seems tiny Reader.

https://apps.apple.com/us/app/tiny-reader-rss/id689519762

Re: It’s Time to Get Back to RSS

#273
post #58

Customizable HN feeds (inofficial): https://edavis.github.io/hnrss/ It's really easy to get posts on the frontpage only if they have more than x points: https://hnrss.org/frontpage?points=x Or contain certain keywords: https://hnrss.org/newest?q=git+OR+linux

This is awesome, configurable RSS feeds are critical for large-scale publishing platforms, thanks for sharing!

Re: It’s Time to Get Back to RSS

#274

Feedly seems nice but it's a total non-starter due to the lack of an email-based signup. I have none of the social media accounts it wants you to log in with and it'll be a cold day in hell before I share that much personal information with an RSS reader anyway. But a brief reading of the privacy policy will tell you that Feedly is a data hoarder and has every intention of selling that information: https://feedly.com…

This is Petr from Feedly, please let us know where in the Privacy Policy you read we're a data hoarder and selling information? We're doing the exact opposite and we can afford it with Feedly Pro, Pro+ and Business as they feed our business so we can stay profitable without the need to sell any customer data.

Re: It’s Time to Get Back to RSS

#275
post #225

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Remember the heady days when Twitter, MySpace, Facebook, et all had almost open access to their 'social graphs', allowing people to grab content from one place, post to another, build connections using tools like Yahoo Pipes? I sometimes long for simpler days when companies were more open with their data. Didn't Netflix even have a more open api back in the day that you could rank and sort, and see new release dates,…

You realise what the most successful thing built on top of that open social graph was, right? Cambridge Analytica.

The issue there was collection of massive amounts of public data by Facebook. Open data APIs can be used to build nice things, if the data isn't user information.

Re: It’s Time to Get Back to RSS

#276
post #259

Wait, shit. Was all that just an advertisement for Feedly !? Oh well. Anyway, for some reason, I do usually enjoy reading the 'Why CSS died' debate when it rears it's head from time to time. I have been toying with the idea of dipping my toes back into RSS. Let's say I don't want to pay for a Feedly subscription. Does anybody know some good places to start, to explore the landscape of available open source RSS reader…

This is Petr from Feedly, we have read this article this morning, Daniel hasn't even let us know about it, so this is definitely not an ad paid by us (we don't pay publishers to write about us)

Re: It’s Time to Get Back to RSS

#277
RSS is incredibly far from dead, everything emits RSS (it's really easy to make something emit RSS), the only thing that ever died was Google Reader. It's not user unfriendly, all RSS readers let you put a site URL in and grab the meta tag for the RSS feed.

If you aren't in RSS world, the question is, why aren't you?

Re: It’s Time to Get Back to RSS

#278
post #193
post #53

RSS is dying (or dead) because it was incompatible with the dominant business model on the internet -- advertising. This is why Google killed it. This is why lots of professional publishers hated it. With HTTP you'd be able to earn money via embedded ads but you'd earn exactly $0 via RSS since the feed was stripped of ads, just content. This forced publishers to put useless blurbs, redirecting to the HTTP version, wh…

Right now the top reply's first sentence is this: > Maybe the world needs an unmonetizable space. I have noticed that people in hackernews generally tend to look things from a, excuse me for saying so, narrow business "make money" perspective. Or maybe it's somewhat US related, I'm not sure. There are thousands of sites that don't live from advertising. Government, universities, and every public or even private insti…

I agree, I think good thing to point out is that incentivizing and monetizing is not the same thing. If you would excuse a tangential argument, I notice that in Eastern culture 'social cache' is much stronger contender to monetary benefit than west; and in Western incentivization = monetization is more stronger. (my theory is that with more individualistic society with less strict societal norm money is one thing most can agreed upon)

Re: It’s Time to Get Back to RSS

#279
post #53

RSS is dying (or dead) because it was incompatible with the dominant business model on the internet -- advertising. This is why Google killed it. This is why lots of professional publishers hated it. With HTTP you'd be able to earn money via embedded ads but you'd earn exactly $0 via RSS since the feed was stripped of ads, just content. This forced publishers to put useless blurbs, redirecting to the HTTP version, wh…

I am building my business fully based on RSS. It is a news API. I got all my data solely form RSS. And I can confirm that the vast majority of news outlets still have it.

https://newscatcherapi.com/

I probably should write a post with exact numbers: * how frequently it is updated * how many websites still support it * etc

Re: It’s Time to Get Back to RSS

#280
post #193
post #53

RSS is dying (or dead) because it was incompatible with the dominant business model on the internet -- advertising. This is why Google killed it. This is why lots of professional publishers hated it. With HTTP you'd be able to earn money via embedded ads but you'd earn exactly $0 via RSS since the feed was stripped of ads, just content. This forced publishers to put useless blurbs, redirecting to the HTTP version, wh…

Right now the top reply's first sentence is this: > Maybe the world needs an unmonetizable space. I have noticed that people in hackernews generally tend to look things from a, excuse me for saying so, narrow business "make money" perspective. Or maybe it's somewhat US related, I'm not sure. There are thousands of sites that don't live from advertising. Government, universities, and every public or even private insti…

The blog itself seemed like an example of content marketing, As is evident from "I challenge you to signup for Feedly" at the end of the article.
Post reply on HN