I notice that Nanoc, the static site generator they use for their docs pages, isn't mentioned there. Maybe it's just too small to matter?
Every software system used at Gitlab
121–123 of 123 posts
Re: Every software system used at Gitlab
#122Earlier quoted context omitted.
This isn't a recommendation or advice but if you're after a ledger that's larger than what Xero can offer to a big org, Netsuite seems to be what Gitlab uses and is ironically enough also what Xero uses. Unfortunately (and somewhat ironically?) we're too big to actually have Xero run on Xero
If you’d like some feedback, for us it’s less a volume issue and more a case of design limitations. We run subledgers per customer in our own code for clearing and settlement (we’re a two-sided network), and posting the rollups back to Xero sometimes runs into edge cases and limitations. Recognition timing is one pain point, another is API-driven reconciliation. What I’d struggle to give up is the ease of reporting.…
Thanks for your feedback!
While I don't work on the product (directly) or speak in any official capacity, I can definitely route your pain points and compliments to the respective teams internally :)
Re: Every software system used at Gitlab
#123I'm so sick of Gitlab support spam in every thread that mentions any issue, making it so that critical conversations are interrupted with self serving pitches! >I once saw Gitlab do this thing. >Hey, Bob from Gitlab thing here. We are really trying to make thing great for our customers . Our next release of thing will do foo which we hope will fix this. Here is a link to a marketing post comparing us to GitHub. Hope…
I feel the same way when grumpy customers spam posts about interesting topics with their complaints.
Can we all agree to just talk about the interesting thing that was posted, and skip the one-off customer stuff? (I predict: no.)