Live data from Hacker News

Tech workers consider escaping Silicon Valley’s sky-high rents

bloomberg.com

411–420 of 424 posts

Re: Tech workers consider escaping Silicon Valley’s sky-high rents

#411

People are going to be moving Mountain House or Reno at farthest, not Cleveland. Though the thought of buying a literal mansion near Boise with your techbux is amusing.

Mountain House near Tracy? I don't think I've ever heard of Mountain House before.

Don't get me wrong, it's kind of a weird planned community in the desert. I only know it because my coworker moved there and had a 1-2 hour commute into San Jose.

Re: Tech workers consider escaping Silicon Valley’s sky-high rents

#412
post #410

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What do you get in SF that you can't get in Des Moines? I lived in Des Moines until last year and I find most answers to this question are wrong: you can in fact get it in Des Moines. Sometimes Des Moines is even better, though I'll admit in most cases the vastly smaller size limits quantity of choices.

Diverse younger people from all around the world that are trying to reach their full potential.

You get that in Des Moines. Not nearly as many but they are there.

Re: Tech workers consider escaping Silicon Valley’s sky-high rents

#413
post #410

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Diverse younger people from all around the world that are trying to reach their full potential.

You get that in Des Moines. Not nearly as many but they are there.

I have nothing against Des Moines so I'm trying to tread lightly here but I have a hard time believing someone from say London, Amsterdam, Hong Kong, or Sydney would move across the world to end up in Des Moines at even a fraction of the rate as New York City, San Francisco, Los Angeles, etc. It's a fine place, I'm sure, but it lacks global pull that would bring in talented people from all corners of the earth.

Re: Tech workers consider escaping Silicon Valley’s sky-high rents

#414

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Absolutely true. Once you move out of the center of a high-density, major metropolitan area, you literally cannot find and use private schools, airports, hospitals, and theme parks. And your IQ drops by 50 points. Instantly. It's weird.

That's not what I said, so your sarcasm is misplaced and makes you seem unnecessarily irritated. Maybe you are misunderstanding the meaning of "greater metro area" which means "a metro area and surrounding, connected developments" and not "better than rural metro area."

I live in northeast Alabama currently, in a rural area, well outside any metropolitan area. Now, I can't speak to private schools; I don't have kids.

As far as airports go, there are two connector airports about an hour away, to the northeast and west, and a major hub two hours east. (As it turns out, even when I've lived in major metropolitan areas, I've never been closer than an hour to an airport.)

There are two regional hospitals relatively close (plus trauma helicopters if you need that sort of thing). Then there are major hospitals an hour west, plus Birmingham and Nashville---both of which I've known people to go to for specialized care.

I honestly don't know what you mean by "high infrastructure recreation"; if it's outdoor sporting and recreation, it's as good here as anywhere (and fishing is better than most).

There is a dearth of bars and live-music venues, but then I didn't partake of those even when I had easy access.

So, when you write "And of course by moving outside a greater metro area, you're also saving money by choosing not to consume any amenities of private schools, airports, large hospitals, high infrastructure recreation, etc." you seem to have a very wrong idea of life outside a "greater metro area", one that is either extremely naive or deliberately insulting.

And I'm not irritated, just cranky.

Re: Tech workers consider escaping Silicon Valley’s sky-high rents

#415
How does everyone feel about moving to Sacramento and upgrading your living spaces if you were able to commute to work on a flight to the Silicon Valley in less than 30 minutes if and when you have to be physically present at the office so you do not suffer a detrimental effect on your career that "aripickar" highlights.

If you feel positive about this idea, give us a little information about your commute needs via the form below and at what price point this flight would need to be at for you to justify the move.

We will publish the results here so everyone can see ( names redacted obviously) so you can get an idea if this is just a few folks talking or if this pressure to move out of the Valley is a real phenomena.

https://www.uamcah.com/sacramento-to-bay-area

Re: Tech workers consider escaping Silicon Valley’s sky-high rents

#416
post #413

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You get that in Des Moines. Not nearly as many but they are there.

I have nothing against Des Moines so I'm trying to tread lightly here but I have a hard time believing someone from say London, Amsterdam, Hong Kong, or Sydney would move across the world to end up in Des Moines at even a fraction of the rate as New York City, San Francisco, Los Angeles, etc. It's a fine place, I'm sure, but it lacks global pull that would bring in talented people from all corners of the earth.

I agree there isn't much global pull. That is the point, even without any global pull there is a diversity of people in the city. Not as many as SF by any means, but on a small scale it is there.

Re: Tech workers consider escaping Silicon Valley’s sky-high rents

#417

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yeah, agreed. I don't appreciate this type of race to the bottom. I live in a Low cost of living area, but my work output is not dependent on geographical location. If I do less or worse work than someone on my team in a HCOL area, I would be up for a PIP or worse. I would be absolutely fine with getting paid less, if my company had an expectation of lesser output. But, as it stand, I am expected to deliver as well o…

And yet you still gets paid a lot more than your equivalent in a lower-cost country. Yet employees in Europe or Asia aren't expected to produce less either.

You are correct, and I still find that outsourcing to be a problem.

Re: Tech workers consider escaping Silicon Valley’s sky-high rents

#418

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That's not helpful for the majority of people that actually like where they live. I live in the middle of a city because I like living in the middle of a city , for reasons that have nothing to do with where I work. Most people are not harboring a secret desire to suddenly move to a completely different type of neighborhood for the cheap land if they no longer have to commute. Being forced to purchase a larger living…

You make some good points. I don't know that your desire matches with the majority of people living in a big city. I mean, I'm sure there are lots of people who do like living there, but there are also lots of people who have moved from elsewhere to big cities specifically for job opportunities. Being in a big city has its advantages (jobs, access to more specialized businesses and ammenities) but also its costs (cri…

I’m not saying you’re wrong, but you first need to establish that there is, in fact, a large group of people living in cities because they “have to” for work. I don’t think this can be treated as a fact without some evidence. The power of cities isn’t some US-only phenomenon, it has been the dominant economic engine for centuries.

Re: Tech workers consider escaping Silicon Valley’s sky-high rents

#419
post #6

“I think it's fair to say that Silicon Valley is dead.” —Altavista founder, 1993 https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/alt.folklore.comp... (Note: Google Groups links don’t work on mobile unless you Request Desktop Site in Chrome)

Interesting, however he did have a point about prop 13.

Re: Tech workers consider escaping Silicon Valley’s sky-high rents

#420

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That's not what I said, so your sarcasm is misplaced and makes you seem unnecessarily irritated. Maybe you are misunderstanding the meaning of "greater metro area" which means "a metro area and surrounding, connected developments" and not "better than rural metro area."

I live in northeast Alabama currently, in a rural area, well outside any metropolitan area. Now, I can't speak to private schools; I don't have kids. As far as airports go, there are two connector airports about an hour away, to the northeast and west, and a major hub two hours east. (As it turns out, even when I've lived in major metropolitan areas, I've never been closer than an hour to an airport.) There are two r…

No, I have the right idea just as you corroborated. There are amenities of legitimate value in a metro area. You do not care for them, so it doesn’t make sense for you to pay for easy access to them. However, saving money by reducing consumption is a lifestyle choice. Many people would rather choose to consume. That’s all I was trying to point out.

There are network effects as well. I live 15 minutes from an airport with daily direct flights to the my parent’s home country. There are only a few such airports in the USA. Places with that kind of infrastructure also tend to have other valuable infrastructure. So even though I don’t benefit from the live music venue 2 blocks from my home, it’s part of the deal of being able to return home on short notice in emergency.

Post reply on HN