Live data from Hacker News

TSMC Announces Intention to Build and Operate Advanced Semiconductor Fab in U.S.

tsmc.com

41–50 of 438 posts

Re: TSMC Announces Intention to Build and Operate Advanced Semiconductor Fab in U.S.

#41
post #35

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Other Fabs are already located in the area, and in general the state has been good towards businesses. Also ASU is nearby so they have a talent pool of new engineers to pull from. Anecdote, since I've moved to AZ myself 5 years ago I've noticed massive growth in tech businesses in Phoenix and the surrounding areas. Cost of living for people here is also cheaper compared to to other cities I've lived in, and many peop…

Greetz from Tempe.

And hello from Chandler :)

Re: TSMC Announces Intention to Build and Operate Advanced Semiconductor Fab in U.S.

#42

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Thank you for providing context. During the 80s & 90s, one of my besties worked on building fabs in and around PHX. Really exotic stuff that I didn't really understand. He'd joke that he had a PhD in welding. He claimed at the time that fabs were migrating from California to PHX and ABX to avoid environmental regulation (enforcement) and cheaper water. While he was concerned about building future superfund sites, he…

Semiconductor plants use a ridiculous amount of potentially harmful chemicals as part of the manufacturing process. Most of the material is recaptured and never makes it into the local environment. Intel uses probably close to 10M gallons of water a DAY and recycles the vast majority. Before water enters a fab it goes through a water purification plant to eliminate any impurities. As the water leaves the fab it goes…

A question is - what do they do with the waste from treatment. One former superfund site near the house I grew up in in South San Jose wasn't because they dumped toxic chemicals or water directly in the ground, but that they sealed them on site and the containment mechanism failed and they ended up leaking into the groundwater.

I could only assume they have much better monitoring of these situations nowadays.

Re: TSMC Announces Intention to Build and Operate Advanced Semiconductor Fab in U.S.

#43

Why are fabs being built in az?

ASU puts out some pretty talented semiconductor engineers, and ON Semiconductor is a major supplier based in Phoenix

ASU isn't exactly a premier college for engineering. They have good parties tho

Re: TSMC Announces Intention to Build and Operate Advanced Semiconductor Fab in U.S.

#44

Has been under discussion for some time: "Mark Liu, the chairman of TSMC, said he had recently discussed options for a new factory in the United States with the Commerce Department. The stumbling block was money; major subsidies would be required, he said, as it is more expensive to operate in America than Taiwan." ( https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/25/technology/pentagon-taiwa... )

What makes up the price differential?

Having to ship the raw material halfway across the world. More stringent environmental protections--fabs generate many tons of hazardous waste. Higher healthcare costs for the workers. Plus they use lots of water which is more expensive in Arizona.

Re: TSMC Announces Intention to Build and Operate Advanced Semiconductor Fab in U.S.

#45
I suspect this is the result of DARPA’s big interposer push and it’s leaking now because of the change in leadership there.

Specifically TSMC has breakthrough CoWoS interposers, can’t meet demand, and the military is bottlenecked without a chiplet path made in the USA.

Re: TSMC Announces Intention to Build and Operate Advanced Semiconductor Fab in U.S.

#46

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Semiconductor plants use a ridiculous amount of potentially harmful chemicals as part of the manufacturing process. Most of the material is recaptured and never makes it into the local environment. Intel uses probably close to 10M gallons of water a DAY and recycles the vast majority. Before water enters a fab it goes through a water purification plant to eliminate any impurities. As the water leaves the fab it goes…

A question is - what do they do with the waste from treatment. One former superfund site near the house I grew up in in South San Jose wasn't because they dumped toxic chemicals or water directly in the ground, but that they sealed them on site and the containment mechanism failed and they ended up leaking into the groundwater. I could only assume they have much better monitoring of these situations nowadays.

> question is - what do they do with the waste from treatment.

System reliability is a big question.

> wasn't because they dumped toxic chemicals or water directly in the ground, but that [...] mechanism failed

It's not an isolated incident, leaks is actually the most common cause. Many fabs became superfunds not because the owners are evil, but because many safeguards, industrial or regulatory, were simply not in place at that time.

Let me repost an older comment.

I'd say early inexperience on semiconductor manufacturing was another major factor responsible for the pollution, many safeguards, industrial or regulatory, were simply not in place at that time. For example, many plants had storage tanks as parts of the production process, a common practice in the industry - most ended up having a massive leak, releasing various harmful chemical pollutants, including highly toxic TCE. And it seems the companies weren't doing it deliberately to save costs, many pollution events were "just" industrial accidents, and few foresaw the consequences of leaking tanks, not to say that some leaks were only discovered years later.

Now the companies are doing the cleanup under the supervision of the EPA, I think it's fortunate in a sense that these companies are the world's most powerful ones and they have the ability to pay, not some non-existent companies that already declared bankruptcy. And unfortunately, the price we are paying now for being ignorant in the early days is that the pollution still requires many years, or even many decades, of work to achieve even a basic, minimum level of cleanup. Some cleanup efforts have been active since the late 80s, and was still being continued working on in the 2010s.

Some examples:

* COMMODORE SEMICONDUCTOR GROUP

(Yes, the plant that produced MOS 6502 that we knew and love, and it was a pioneer for making the first widely-used microprocessor for personal computers, and also a pioneer for having a massive leak of TCE storage tank...)

> Background: Waste solvents were stored in an underground concrete storage tank on site until 1975, when it was taken out of service. An unlined steel tank was installed next to the concrete one in 1975. Inspections conducted by the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (PADEP) indicated that both tanks leaked.

> Cleanup: In 1981, Commodore excavated soils and pumped water from a contaminated well, then sprayed it onto surrounding fields. The volatile organic compounds (VOCs) dissipated into the air. Since 1984, air strippers have been in use to remove solvents from the groundwater.[...] Construction of the groundwater extraction and treatment system began in the Fall of 1999. In February 2000, pipelines and underground wiring were installed, pumps were installed at each of the extraction wells, and the groundwater treatment building was constructed. The treatment process equipment was installed in May 2000. Preliminary start-up and testing of the system began in August 2000.

* ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC.

> Background: Two below-ground acid neutralization system (ANS) tank vaults were located at the northern and southern ends of the 901 and 902 Thompson Place buildings, respectively. Leaks from these ANS tanks appears to be the primary on-site source of VOCs to groundwater in this area.

> Cleanup: After the two acid neutralization tanks were removed, AMD excavated and disposed of soil impacted with VOCs, and installed a groundwater extraction and treatment system. Extracted groundwater was treated with air stripping technology followed by carbon adsorption. [...] The groundwater extraction and treatment system began operating in 1983 and continued through 2002, when it was discontinued with State approval to allow for an in-situ bioremediation (ISB) pilot test. The full-scale ISB system, which was initially pilot-tested from 2002 through 2004, and then expanded in 2005, includes groundwater treatment by carbon filtration and injection of an organic carbon source to stimulate the growth of naturally-occurring microbes that break down target VOCs into environmentally-benign end products.

* INTEL CORP. (MOUNTAIN VIEW PLANT)

> Background: The site is one of three Superfund or National Priorities List (NPL) sites that are being cleaned up simultaneously. The other two Superfund sites are the Fairchild Semiconductor Corp. (Mountain View Plant) site and the Raytheon site. The three sites are located in the Middlefield-Ellis-Whisman (MEW) Study Area. Site investigations at several of these facilities during 1981 and 1982 revealed significant soil and groundwater contamination by toxic chemicals, primarily volatile organic compounds (VOCs).

> Cleanup: Under EPA’s direction and oversight, Intel has implemented the soil and groundwater cleanup program at the former Intel facility. The soil cleanup has been completed at the site and all the former MEW facilities.

* FAIRCHILD SEMICONDUCTOR CORP. (MOUNTAIN VIEW PLANT)

> Background: The 56-acre former Fairchild Semiconductor Corp. (Mountain View) site is located in Mountain View, California. A facility on site manufactured semiconductors. The site is one of three Superfund National Priorities List (NPL) sites that are being cleaned up simultaneously.

> Cleanup Activities: Under EPA’s direction and oversight, [...] Fairchild Semiconductor Corp. [...] implemented soil and groundwater cleanup programs that have included soil excavation and treatment, installation of four slurry walls, soil vapor extraction and treatment systems, and groundwater extraction and treatment systems. The soil cleanup by soil vapor extraction and excavation and aeration has been completed at all the former MEW facilities, including the former Fairchild facilities. Groundwater cleanup will continue to operate for many decades in order to meet the trichloroethene (TCE) groundwater cleanup standard of 5 parts per billion. The MEW site groundwater remedy has removed over 76,000 pounds of contaminants, and has reduced contaminant concentrations throughout the multiple aquifer zones.

> HEWLETT-PACKARD (620-640 PAGE MILL ROAD)

> Cleanup: Extensive investigation and cleanup at the HP Site has been conducted since discovery of a release from a 1,000-gallon underground waste solvent tank in 1981. Interim remedial measures included excavation and off-site disposal between 1987 and 1992 of approximately 10,700 cubic yards of soil, construction and operation (beginning in 1994) of a soil vapor extraction and treatment (SVET) system; and groundwater extraction and treatment beginning in 1987 and continuing to the present day.

> NATIONAL SEMICONDUCTOR CORP.

> Background: The National Semiconductor Corporation (National Semiconductor) previously manufactured electronic equipment at this 50-acre site. Underground storage tanks, sumps, and pipes are the suspected sources for contaminated groundwater and soil in Sunnyvale underneath the site.

> Cleanup: Beginning in 1982, contaminated soils, leaking tanks and equipment were removed. Subsequently, National Semiconductor initiated a program of pumping and treating the groundwater to contain the contaminated plume while further site studies were underway. In 1989, National Semiconductor began investigating the type and extent of contamination at the site. The investigation was completed in 1991, and the EPA selected the final remedy for the site. Construction of the remedy began in 1991. The final cleanup remedy, which includes soil vapor extraction and operation of the groundwater extraction and treatment system, is ongoing.

Re: TSMC Announces Intention to Build and Operate Advanced Semiconductor Fab in U.S.

#47

This would be an interesting turn of events if it came to pass. It would certainly add good data to the argument that TSMC chips are cheaper because of the economics of east Asia. The geopolitical aspects are, to me at least, a bit over blown. Yes there has been growing concern about the integrity of the supply chain for critical resources, but that is the whole globalization problem in a nutshell. I find the calls t…

>(For context, I see globalization as a means of maximizing profits, not about politics)

Globalization is just a euphemism for hegemony. First it was the British Empire, then the American Empire.

Re: TSMC Announces Intention to Build and Operate Advanced Semiconductor Fab in U.S.

#48

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What makes up the price differential?

Having to ship the raw material halfway across the world. More stringent environmental protections--fabs generate many tons of hazardous waste. Higher healthcare costs for the workers. Plus they use lots of water which is more expensive in Arizona.

Considering how the low cost of shipping enabled globalization I doubt the shipping costs matter much. I'm also not sure if environmental protections are that much more stringent in the US than in Taiwan. Higher healthcare costs and water might make sense, but the bulk of the water cost in semiconductor manufacturing is probably due to the purification processes required than the volume of water used.

Re: TSMC Announces Intention to Build and Operate Advanced Semiconductor Fab in U.S.

#49

Earlier quoted context omitted.

ASU puts out some pretty talented semiconductor engineers, and ON Semiconductor is a major supplier based in Phoenix

ASU isn't exactly a premier college for engineering. They have good parties tho

Maybe not for undergrad, but undergraduates don't learn how to do semiconductor manufacturing.

Re: TSMC Announces Intention to Build and Operate Advanced Semiconductor Fab in U.S.

#50
post #7

How much software depends on Apple, AMD, Nvidia, or Qualcomm chips? TSMC is an indispensable part of our industry's supply chain. Most of its chips are produced in Taiwan and over 75% are sold to customers in either the USA or (mainland) China, so TSMC understandably tries to remain neutral in trade disputes between the two. Tim Culpan at Bloomberg recently predicted that this neutrality may not hold for long, and TS…

Literally everyone but the hardware manufacturers would be happier if the software didn't depend on those chips.

If we can't move the supply chain closer we should at least decouple software from particular hardware manufacturers.

Post reply on HN