Live data from Hacker News

GM self-driving tech unit Cruise laying off about 8% of staff

reuters.com

31–40 of 296 posts

Re: GM self-driving tech unit Cruise laying off about 8% of staff

#31

Just a note, but this is a perfect time for companies to lay off low performers without getting a lot of flak. This is usually the case when you see companies lay off people while continuing to hire as well.

GM is not hiring. The auto industry is being hit hard right now. And Cruise is notorious for being a toxic mess as is.

Re: GM self-driving tech unit Cruise laying off about 8% of staff

#32

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's not at all uncommon for companies to simultaneously perform layoffs while actively hiring.

Sell the highs, buy the lows

Or you could see it as, they know who are the low performers. This is a good way to fire low performers in bulk without getting a lot of flak

Re: GM self-driving tech unit Cruise laying off about 8% of staff

#33

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I never hear the phrase "doubling down" used to mean "doubling", except maybe in the original usage in gambling. But colloquially it just means "increasing focus on". In that use there is no inherent contradiction in downsizing + attempting to increasing focus. In fact that seems to be what almost all companies who downsize are attempting to do. Edit: In fact come to think of it, even in blackjack when you double dow…

doubling down is not about increasing focus. It is about increasing risk by making a BIGGER (not smaller) bet on something. This is in the original meaning in gambling (you are convinced you are right and so double your bet) and elsewhere. Only in PR land is a cash flow pullback and risk reduction step such as a headcount reduction called a doubling down. It goes to show how pernicious these types of intentional misw…

Amazon launched Fire Phone and Alexa months apart. They shit-canned the phone and doubled down on Alexa. It’s not just PR speak.

Many of the phone people either left the company or went to work on Alexa. They also did a massive inventory write down for the phone in their quarterly report.

Re: GM self-driving tech unit Cruise laying off about 8% of staff

#34

Funny, as they were just a few weeks ago (even during the lockdown) certain recruiters were saying they were aggressively hiring -- and are still listed as hiring for example here: https://layoffs.fyi/tracker/ Seems like suddenly they got worried about how long they can maintain the burn rate. Doesn't help that driving and commuting fell off the map.

Full self-driving is a long way off, but GM can use Cruise to develop new active safety systems for their current cars. I don't think GM is doing as well there as Toyota or Honda, let alone Tesla.

Re: GM self-driving tech unit Cruise laying off about 8% of staff

#36

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>Doubling down = 2x the engineering staff. This is as they lay off in their lidar team. Self driving will be solved with computer vision. Lidar is an unnecessary technology even for full level 5 autonomy. Most self driving companies have come to this conclusion by now.

Any data to back this up besides Musk saying his approach's the best?

https://twitter.com/comma_ai/status/1197323020852793344

Re: GM self-driving tech unit Cruise laying off about 8% of staff

#38
post #31

Just a note, but this is a perfect time for companies to lay off low performers without getting a lot of flak. This is usually the case when you see companies lay off people while continuing to hire as well.

GM is not hiring. The auto industry is being hit hard right now. And Cruise is notorious for being a toxic mess as is.

On other forums it seems like it splits into two group. One group says that it depends on the team and that they love their current team. And the other group is how working for Cruise is the worst decision they've made in their life.

My curiosity is with, how does a company totally change their culture and do a complete 180%? From having workers completely hating their current company to completely not seeing themselves in moving to a different company. As some companies used to have employees mentioning it is the worst tech company in the bay area to one of the best in the bay area

Post reply on HN