Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's a weird recommendation. I think you might have viewed it differently as a bit of a retrospective or perspective piece. I can't possibly so how the teacher thought suggesting that book to an angsty teen to be a good idea. That's the time kids need to have their world opened, not their angst re-affirmed. Very strange.
Thing is I was already reading some pretty bleak stuff at the time, e.g. Brave New World and 1984, and as you can probably imagine the trials of a mopey teenager didn't really impress much when put up against poor Winston and Room 101 etc.
Ask HN: Mind bending books to read and never be the same as before?
721–730 of 747 posts
Re: Ask HN: Mind bending books to read and never be the same as before?
#722• "Laws of Form" by George Spencer-Brown, a little book that describes how to bootstrap the Universe from nothing. Louis Kauffman [1] has a lot of papers/writeups on it, from knot theory to quantum physics. If you ever wanted to make a pancake truly from scratch, this is a place to start. • "The Unconscious as Infinite Sets" by Ignacio Matte Blanco. Reformulates Freud in logico-mathematical terms and establishes a fo…
Retroactively, I would also add "A Thousand Plateaus" by Deleuze & Guattari to this list, except that I haven't yet read the actual thing, but only dipped my toes into related studies, like e.g. "The Allure of Machinic Life" by John Johnston that traces the history of cybernetics, A-Life and AI fields and adds a Deleuzian spin on top. This is the only case in my life where I wanted to adopt author's philosophy and le…
Books like that, I think there is a lot of value in just diving in and seeing what happens. I would highly recommend it.
Re: Ask HN: Mind bending books to read and never be the same as before?
#723Earlier quoted context omitted.
Apart from playing twice, I can't think of a statement that could exclude you from choosing arbitrarily between A and B, since within the conceit of the problem there is no way to exclude B with a mere statement.
For this statement I will receive prize A or C.
The answer is false and evaluation is true until the prize is actually given. Then the answer becomes true and the evaluation false.
I wonder if the question could be reworded somehow to say that the prize being awarded and the statement being evaluated true/false will happen at the same instant without taking the fun out of it.
Re: Ask HN: Mind bending books to read and never be the same as before?
#724• "Laws of Form" by George Spencer-Brown, a little book that describes how to bootstrap the Universe from nothing. Louis Kauffman [1] has a lot of papers/writeups on it, from knot theory to quantum physics. If you ever wanted to make a pancake truly from scratch, this is a place to start. • "The Unconscious as Infinite Sets" by Ignacio Matte Blanco. Reformulates Freud in logico-mathematical terms and establishes a fo…
Retroactively, I would also add "A Thousand Plateaus" by Deleuze & Guattari to this list, except that I haven't yet read the actual thing, but only dipped my toes into related studies, like e.g. "The Allure of Machinic Life" by John Johnston that traces the history of cybernetics, A-Life and AI fields and adds a Deleuzian spin on top. This is the only case in my life where I wanted to adopt author's philosophy and le…
Re: Ask HN: Mind bending books to read and never be the same as before?
#725Anathem by Neal Stephenson features a bifurcated world where a scholar-monk-class of mathematicians lives in walled-off areas that mingle with the rest of the world only on fixed dates. Some every year, some every ten years, and others only every 100 years. There is a lot more to it, but I don't want to give anything away.
Re: Ask HN: Mind bending books to read and never be the same as before?
#726Re: Ask HN: Mind bending books to read and never be the same as before?
#727My contribution: If you're not familiar with Quantum Physics, do check out 'Through Two doors at once'. There were numerous instances while reading the book that I had to just put it down and think deeply - mostly philosophical thoughts around what we are and how magical nature is. The subject matter is very very approachable - even to someone like me who hasn't read a physics book in like a decade.
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/38527619-through-two-doo...
Re: Ask HN: Mind bending books to read and never be the same as before?
#728Earlier quoted context omitted.
Retroactively, I would also add "A Thousand Plateaus" by Deleuze & Guattari to this list, except that I haven't yet read the actual thing, but only dipped my toes into related studies, like e.g. "The Allure of Machinic Life" by John Johnston that traces the history of cybernetics, A-Life and AI fields and adds a Deleuzian spin on top. This is the only case in my life where I wanted to adopt author's philosophy and le…
https://libcom.org/files/A%20Thousand%20Plateaus.pdf Books like that, I think there is a lot of value in just diving in and seeing what happens. I would highly recommend it.
Re: Ask HN: Mind bending books to read and never be the same as before?
#729Earlier quoted context omitted.
This book was really interesting, and ultimately made me decide meditation wasn't worth it for me. (I'm not saying it isn't worth it for others, just that the outcome of meditation that he describes doesn't seem like something I want).
Just out of curiosity, what was the purported outcome/why wasn't it worth it?
Here is a decent overview of the book that goes into more detail: https://slatestarcodex.com/2017/09/18/book-review-mastering-...
Re: Ask HN: Mind bending books to read and never be the same as before?
#730• "Laws of Form" by George Spencer-Brown, a little book that describes how to bootstrap the Universe from nothing. Louis Kauffman [1] has a lot of papers/writeups on it, from knot theory to quantum physics. If you ever wanted to make a pancake truly from scratch, this is a place to start. • "The Unconscious as Infinite Sets" by Ignacio Matte Blanco. Reformulates Freud in logico-mathematical terms and establishes a fo…
i see now that wikipedia states that spencer-brown claimed applications of his approach to big conjectures that never panned out, so now i am extra dubious. it makes sense now why people would go off and try that out.