11–20 of 261 posts
Interesting I read yesterday that OnlyFans started banning for nudes and is refunding customers. Some models lost thousands of dollars. Running porn site requires a lot of paperwork and is relatively risky.
Interesting I read yesterday that OnlyFans started banning for nudes and is refunding customers. Some models lost thousands of dollars. Running porn site requires a lot of paperwork and is relatively risky.
My SO is a camgirl with an onlyfans. She's transitioned from mostly live streaming on MFC to mostly doing shoots and vids for OnlyFans. OnlyFans has become a substantial part of her income.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
We know already where it heads - to young men being radicalized to hate everyone who isn't like them (i.e. not young, male, angry, usually white, usually straight).
I observe this to be a narrative that many are pushing, but I don't see it anywhere IRL or even the proverbial data. I suspect they just fall out of statistics and into depression.
At least OnlyFans is behind a paywall, keeping it out of view of children.
Interesting I read yesterday that OnlyFans started banning for nudes and is refunding customers. Some models lost thousands of dollars. Running porn site requires a lot of paperwork and is relatively risky.
Wasn't that their main cash cow and essentially the only reason for their business to exist? I've never heard of that company in SFW contexts - that's Patreon's territory.
Platform is liable if it is offering prostitution (google "Craigslist controversy"). Only Fans has zero paperwork for this in their disclaimers. I am not a lawyer, but I think they are in gray area.
My opinion: Porn is the new drug. Our daughters are the dealers and our sons are the users. Sex addiction fueled by free internet porn has ruined countless lives. At least OnlyFans is behind a paywall, keeping it out of view of children.
I would like to see a citation on this.
Moral panics around sexuality are at least a couple centuries old, and technologies that are said to have contributed to or created them include the printing press, radio, the bicycle, the car, TV, movies, magazines, and now the Internet. For many of the earlier technologies, Gay Talese's book Thy Neighbor's Wife has a serviceable overview of the moral panics.
My opinion: Porn is the new drug. Our daughters are the dealers and our sons are the users. Sex addiction fueled by free internet porn has ruined countless lives. At least OnlyFans is behind a paywall, keeping it out of view of children.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Well, not to strip naked on the internet. There was a great paper that came out recently demonstrating the value of men's sexuality is negative (vs that of women). Men don't possess anything intrinsically valuable or desirable. There is no fallback. I too wonder what this will mean for (young) men, who have already been pushed down a dark path.
We know already where it heads - to young men being radicalized to hate everyone who isn't like them (i.e. not young, male, angry, usually white, usually straight).
I’d say it’s more of a class thing. They will be angry at the the ruling class and wealthy. I don’t think they are going to be taking it out on old ladies...
This was among my first thoughts when the first unemployment report came out. We are sending our daughters to OnlyFans. Still not sure where our sons end up.
As always, the core issue is economic insecurity, not human sexuality.
It seems amoral to prevent them from making money, why don't we see it as a talent as we see "tech jobs" as talent?
Can it really do more damage than what tech companies specially one who pedal ads and sell customer data and give people anxiety?