Nvidia CEO Introduces Nvidia Ampere Architecture, Nvidia A100 GPU
1–10 of 347 posts
Re: Nvidia CEO Introduces Nvidia Ampere Architecture, Nvidia A100 GPU
#2Re: Nvidia CEO Introduces Nvidia Ampere Architecture, Nvidia A100 GPU
#3I still haven't found anything more cost-effective for double precision data processing (cost + dev time) than a rack full of used Xeons...
Re: Nvidia CEO Introduces Nvidia Ampere Architecture, Nvidia A100 GPU
#4Extending the tensor Ops to FP64 is an interesting, if not surprising, design choice. Are there many applications sure to leverage this capability? Aside from HPL, of course.
You have to remember that the HPC market is $35B today. HPE makes $3B a year alone from that, maybe more with Cray acquisition.
So it's no surprise that NVIDIA wants to position themselves on that market.
Plus, you have too look at the long game with MLX acquisition ( heavy player in the HPC market) and Cumulus. I wouldn't be surprised to see NVIDIA trying to bypass Intel/AMD completely and offer Direct to Interconnect device. Rather than the hybrid CPU + GPU box.
Re: Nvidia CEO Introduces Nvidia Ampere Architecture, Nvidia A100 GPU
#5Full adders in FP units scale with the square of the mantissa bits, so if the number of mantissa bits stay the same, they can reuse the existing units.
Since Nvidia already has existing FP16 units on die, using those units for TF32 calculations probably doesn't cost too much additional die area.
Re: Nvidia CEO Introduces Nvidia Ampere Architecture, Nvidia A100 GPU
#6Re: Nvidia CEO Introduces Nvidia Ampere Architecture, Nvidia A100 GPU
#7Is there a video or something?
Re: Nvidia CEO Introduces Nvidia Ampere Architecture, Nvidia A100 GPU
#8Oof. Double-precision is only 2.5x better, which is less impressive than 20x for float. I still haven't found anything more cost-effective for double precision data processing (cost + dev time) than a rack full of used Xeons...
The 20x 32-bit floating point improvement is probably achieved by comparing doing full FP32 calculations on the previous generation vs doing TF32 calculations on Ampere. This would not be an apple-to-apple comparison as the TF32 result is less precise.
That said, it is probably not terribly important for deep learning at least, given the success of BF16.
Re: Nvidia CEO Introduces Nvidia Ampere Architecture, Nvidia A100 GPU
#9Oof. Double-precision is only 2.5x better, which is less impressive than 20x for float. I still haven't found anything more cost-effective for double precision data processing (cost + dev time) than a rack full of used Xeons...