Red Cross and others will likely be jumping to the aide of those who have been affected by this disaster. If you have a website, please consider adding a message and link to the Red Cross donation website or the link to the donation page of any other website. To get it up ASAP, I've used the HelloBar ( http://www.hellobar.com ) on my site. You can see a working version of it at http://www.webdesigncompany.net but rea…
8.9 earthquake hits Japan
241–250 of 269 posts
Re: 8.9 earthquake hits Japan
#242Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's because everyone in Japan started sending SMSes to everyone they knew practically before the shaking stopped and that DOSed the network. This happens fairly regularly (e.g. for a few minutes after midnight on New Years, when a large portion of Japanese people send well wishes within the same 15 second window).
From my experiences in Germany, SMSes send around midnight New Year did sometimes take several hours to arrive.
Re: 8.9 earthquake hits Japan
#243Re: 8.9 earthquake hits Japan
#244Earlier quoted context omitted.
The doesn't work very well when each device requires a separate communication channel like a cell phone.
It should be much easier for cell phones, since the underlying physical medium is a broadcast medium. It takes significant engineering effort to get rid of this capability.
Re: 8.9 earthquake hits Japan
#245Earlier quoted context omitted.
What's funny is that I was around just after the quake was reported and thought.. "Ooh, no-one's posted it to HN! I should post it." Then I thought "Nah, it's just world news. HN won't care directly about a quake." Then minutes later, this got submitted anyway.
I know, it's totally shocking that hackers care about something other than money or code.
Re: 8.9 earthquake hits Japan
#246Earlier quoted context omitted.
It was on Japanese TV news almost immediately. We were watching it in the office while we were still shaking.
I bet the NHK has a special team always waiting to report on earthquakes and tsunami warnings. They report on many of the smaller quakes very quickly too.
Re: 8.9 earthquake hits Japan
#247An interesting thing I noticed was that all cell phones were completely useless for a pretty long time following the quake. That's normal, but one difference this time, compared with several years ago, is that most people I know no longer have a landline phone at home. People were queuing up for like 20 minutes to use the one old green plastic coin-op pay phone accross the street. At first, I didn't think to use a ph…
The system was a government requirement for events such as yesterday's quake, but I can't confirm all phone disturbances reported were/are due to it.
Technically, it relies on a bitpattern called "accessClasssNBarred".
Re: 8.9 earthquake hits Japan
#248Earlier quoted context omitted.
From Wikipedia: The energy release of an earthquake, which closely correlates to its destructive power, scales with the 3⁄2 power of the shaking amplitude. Thus, a difference in magnitude of 1.0 is equivalent to a factor of 31.6 ( = (101.0)(3 / 2)) in the energy released; a difference in magnitude of 2.0 is equivalent to a factor of 1000 ( = (102.0)(3 / 2) ) in the energy released.[2]
How does energy scale with distance from epicenter?
Larger earthquakes have more low-frequency energy, so they go further.
There's no simple equation, they just use regression to fit the attenuation as a factor of 1/r, 1/r^2 (...), and for magnitude, and for frequency.
You can start here: http://earthquake.usgs.gov/hazards/about/attenuation.php
Re: 8.9 earthquake hits Japan
#249Earlier quoted context omitted.
Probably goes down by r^2 However earthquakes may be "flat", in which case it's by r (i.e. r^1). It's probably somewhere in between those.
Wouldn't it go down by r^2 if the earthquake is flat, and by r^3 if it's not?
Unless you also expect a linear attenuation, due to energy loss through the bedrock.
Re: 8.9 earthquake hits Japan
#250And there's already a growing Wikipedia article on the earthquake: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2011_Sendai_earthquake
WTF - That article states 6,000,000 SIX MILLION deaths? Can this be accurate? It reiterated what I heard on the news regarding passenger trains missing due to the Tsunami - but 6MM??? EDIT: Looks like wiki-trolling... From CNN: The official death toll stood at 137, with 539 injured and 351 missing, according to Kyodo, citing police, but that death toll seemed almost certain to rise -- from 200 to 300 bodies have been…