Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'd still take a heavily configurable and customizable "mess", as you put it, than the one that doesn't allow me to control how it works. There's a good reason why Linux absolutely dominates the server space.
> " There's a good reason why Linux absolutely dominates the server space. " Yeah, it was cheaper (in both senses of the word) than all the other contenders and more or less Unixy enough that software could easily be ported over.
Some of the kernels were even good, but what gain does it bring if tar would always do the most insane action instead of backing-up your disk?