Earlier quoted context omitted.
what technology and infrastructure was funded by the rich? I think you mean funded by the tax payer, rich and poor alike, but the poor pay a higher percentage of income in tax.
> the poor pay a higher percentage of income in tax They certainly don't pay a higher absolute dollar value of the total taxes received by the government though.
Why is the stock market rallying when the economy is so bad?
741–750 of 898 posts
Re: Why is the stock market rallying when the economy is so bad?
#742Earlier quoted context omitted.
How about ripping Wal-Mart apart and replacing it with what existed before - many different shops, each owned by a local person, and many different logsitics networks, each also owned by someone in the area? People on the right often claim to be for the free market and for small, decentralized government, but then turn around and love big, centrally planned conglomerates,just as long as they are owned by share-holder…
> How about ripping Wal-Mart apart and replacing it with what existed before - many different shops, each owned by a local person, and many different logsitics networks, each also owned by someone in the area? You underestimate, vastly, just what they've done to their supply chain, distribution network and logistics to make it that efficient and therefore cheap for their customers. It's part of the reason people swit…
Re: Why is the stock market rallying when the economy is so bad?
#743I work at a big tech company. One of the big realizations we've made is that WFH is not killing our productivity - it may actually be increasing it. If that is widely true, it has huge implications, and points towards an enormous amount of value that can be unlocked, by allowing professionals to work wherever they want (presumably in lower CoL locales). This article indicates that the housing crisis costs the US econ…
I don't know. I work in tech and almost everyone I know is finding themselves less productive and can't wait to get back to the office. Maybe because most of us live in an apartments and not magestic houses with woods or lakes behind them, and the feeling of being trapped indoors is neither healthy nor pushes one to work more effectively. My PC is in my living room and I'm on it, in the same seat, at the same desk, u…
Re: Why is the stock market rallying when the economy is so bad?
#744Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Faith in humanity: buy stocks. No faith in humanity: buy gold. Speaking to a friend who bought stocks recently, they said, "I'm bullish on America." I might say if you are the opposite of bullish, then buy gold. And if you have no faith in humanity, buy a survivalist bunker.
The survivalist bunker idea is so stupid for the kind of people I see investing in them. These are Silicon Valley guys with $10+m in the bank but have never even been in a fistfight. If the shit truly hits the fan they are going to be very quickly relieved of their nice bunkers by a few Bud Light drinking boys 2 years removed from their Army deployment.
Re: Why is the stock market rallying when the economy is so bad?
#745Earlier quoted context omitted.
Get rid of the wealthy and enjoy becoming the USSR?
You mean go from a peasant nation to first (object,man,woman,space station) in space?
Re: Why is the stock market rallying when the economy is so bad?
#746Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think the threat model is packs of desperate people looking to take your stuff, not bombs.
Being underground won't help much if your assailants decide to smoke you out. To stop that you'd need to shoot back or have a very robust and well designed fortification, with air filtration and redundant hidden vents. If you were committed to fighting back, an above ground fortification made out of reinforced concrete would be easier/cheaper to construct and would probably give you a better view of your surroundings…
A castle. You're describing a castle. :)
Re: Why is the stock market rallying when the economy is so bad?
#747Earlier quoted context omitted.
what technology and infrastructure was funded by the rich? I think you mean funded by the tax payer, rich and poor alike, but the poor pay a higher percentage of income in tax.
> I think you mean funded by the tax payer, rich and poor alike The rich pay disproportionately a lot more. Most technology is funded by the rich either directly or through the majority of the taxes they pay. 97% of taxes are paid by the top 50%.
And so they should.
the top 50% has a lower band of $41k annual income in the US. they are not rich, in many places they would struggle to support a family on that.
>The top 1 percent of American earners pay almost 40 percent of all federal income taxes. That’s more than the bottom 90 percent pay combined
that fact should not be celebrated as how generous the top 1% are but rather how unequal the system is that this can be the case.
Re: Why is the stock market rallying when the economy is so bad?
#748Earlier quoted context omitted.
Get rid of the wealthy and enjoy becoming the USSR?
You mean go from a peasant nation to first (object,man,woman,space station) in space?
(In fact, Marx considered Russia the least likely candidate for a communist revolution; it would start in England or Germany.)
Re: Why is the stock market rallying when the economy is so bad?
#749Earlier quoted context omitted.
If you're Canadian and you think you have this beat, you're wrong. https://www.endcoronavirus.org/countries
This is a naive way to interpret the situation -- it doesn't even account for testing rate or death rate.
Re: Why is the stock market rallying when the economy is so bad?
#750Earlier quoted context omitted.
Advocates of big government love these metrics that have been put through the academic ringer, so-as to spit out whatever tortured output is expected. Why look at this kind of esoteric figure at all? Why not look at, you know, real numbers? Spending as percentage of GDP: Denmark - 52% of GDP Norway - 55% of GDP Finland - 53% of GDP Sweden - 50% of GDP Iceland - 42% of GDP Average - 50.5% USA - 22% of GDP What does al…
The US poverty rate is very misleading. It’s not the percent of people in poverty. It’s the percentage of people below a level of income at which not being impoverished is impossible.