The Acer Swift is limited to only 8GB of (non-upgrade) ram, which is a deal breaker for most developers. I also wonder about that Wi-Fi 6 chip and its Linux support. If it wasn't for those factors, I'd probably get one.
This is totally an aside, and probably shows how out of touch I am, but there must be developers who need 8+ GB, and others who don't. I was always under the impression that things like editors and compilers didn't need a lot of computing performance. So I'm curious what kinds of development demand more performance. Is it a hard wall that you hit, or more of just a progressive degradation of performance?
The $1,799 MacBook Pro 13 vs. the $650 Acer Swift 3
21–30 of 92 posts
Re: The $1,799 MacBook Pro 13 vs. the $650 Acer Swift 3
#22I love these articles because the writers are so earnest and seem to be oblivious to the fact that buyers do not care.
If people weren't reading those articles the writers would not be incentivized to write them in the first place.
Re: The $1,799 MacBook Pro 13 vs. the $650 Acer Swift 3
#23There are some pretty legitimate reasons to come away from Apple products now in my opinion, including some very competitive hardware at lower prices. I've been quite a happy Linux user for a long time now.
Re: The $1,799 MacBook Pro 13 vs. the $650 Acer Swift 3
#24These posts are obnoxious. People don't buy Macs b/c of their impressive tech specs - they buy them b/c of macOS.
1. Used to mac only software or workflow 2. ercieved supramacy in security 3. Ios compatibility 4. etc
The price/ hardware spec ratio by and large always goes to Windows boxes, but for many people the change in OS disrupts too many other areas in life to justify the discount
Re: The $1,799 MacBook Pro 13 vs. the $650 Acer Swift 3
#25The Acer Swift is limited to only 8GB of (non-upgrade) ram, which is a deal breaker for most developers. I also wonder about that Wi-Fi 6 chip and its Linux support. If it wasn't for those factors, I'd probably get one.
This is totally an aside, and probably shows how out of touch I am, but there must be developers who need 8+ GB, and others who don't. I was always under the impression that things like editors and compilers didn't need a lot of computing performance. So I'm curious what kinds of development demand more performance. Is it a hard wall that you hit, or more of just a progressive degradation of performance?
Re: The $1,799 MacBook Pro 13 vs. the $650 Acer Swift 3
#26These posts are obnoxious. People don't buy Macs b/c of their impressive tech specs - they buy them b/c of macOS.
Re: The $1,799 MacBook Pro 13 vs. the $650 Acer Swift 3
#27Sadly because unless there is a miracle to secure licensing IP from Intel in the process this will remove virtualization options for Windows from the platform.
Re: The $1,799 MacBook Pro 13 vs. the $650 Acer Swift 3
#28This is not news, this has always been true. People keep buying MacBooks, it’s been one of the best selling laptops for a decade. There must be some other reason why people like them.... Maybe benchmarks don’t matter to most people? Really makes you think