Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

A new Moon race has begun

economist.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

21–30 of 34 posts

Re: A new Moon race has begun

#21

Post by avmich »

0x8BADF00D wrote: post #10
bryanlarsen wrote: post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Landing on the moon in 2024 is far less ridiculous a statement than Kennedy's moon announcement in 1961 was. We can do it, we just don't want to badly enough.

Manned spaceflight and stations are unnecessary in the near term. Autonomous drones and machines can bootstrap colonization. A mining refinery can be bootstrapped easily, all remotely. Then asteroid mining droids will drop their payloads there for refinement and processing.

> https://www.wired.com/2012/04/space-humans-vs-robots/

> If space exploration continues to focus on sending robots to other planets, "we will learn less about the solar system in the next 100 years than we will if we engage in an ambitious program of human exploration,"

In other words, sending humans could be more efficient use of funds. This is an old topic which was rehashed many times; some conclude that robot's advantage here is not real.

Re: A new Moon race has begun

#22

Post by avmich »

prewett wrote: post #14
derekp7 wrote: post #13

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Agreed. The benchmark I use is I'll believe that robotic missions make human missions irrelevant, when the day comes that I can get a roomba that works across multiple floors, climbing stairs (and cleaning stairs), empties itself in the trash can, and avoids pet messes instead of dragging poop all over the floor. Or a laundry system that grabs the basket of dirty laundry (or better yet, picks the close off the floor)…

If you were going to make a 100% robotic factory/refinery/etc. you would design it for robots. The problem with the Roomba is that houses are designed for people, not robots. A robotic factory could avoid a lot of problems by not needing to design for people. While I disagree with your benchmark, I don't think we're going to be putting robotic factories in space in 3-4 years. Have we even built a 100% robotic factory…

> Plus, I don't think that anyone has built an autonomous robot for zero-g yet (I'm not counting satellites and Canada-arm).

https://www.theverge.com/2017/7/17/15981250/japan-space-came...

"Japan’s space agency has for the first time released photos and videos taken on the International Space Station by its resident robot drone..."

Re: A new Moon race has begun

#23

Post by derekp7 »

prewett wrote: post #14
derekp7 wrote: post #13

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Agreed. The benchmark I use is I'll believe that robotic missions make human missions irrelevant, when the day comes that I can get a roomba that works across multiple floors, climbing stairs (and cleaning stairs), empties itself in the trash can, and avoids pet messes instead of dragging poop all over the floor. Or a laundry system that grabs the basket of dirty laundry (or better yet, picks the close off the floor)…

If you were going to make a 100% robotic factory/refinery/etc. you would design it for robots. The problem with the Roomba is that houses are designed for people, not robots. A robotic factory could avoid a lot of problems by not needing to design for people. While I disagree with your benchmark, I don't think we're going to be putting robotic factories in space in 3-4 years. Have we even built a 100% robotic factory…

But that factory won't do any good unless it gets input, and can put its output somewhere. The input would supposedly be from the local regolith which has a lot of the same problems that the example roomba would face.

Now a factory on Mars that takes in sunlight and atmosphere, and fills a tank with rocket fuel, could be possible. But in that case I would call it a specialized machine, not a factory or a robot.

Re: A new Moon race has begun

#24

Post by derekp7 »

kyuudou wrote: post #17
derekp7 wrote: post #13

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Agreed. The benchmark I use is I'll believe that robotic missions make human missions irrelevant, when the day comes that I can get a roomba that works across multiple floors, climbing stairs (and cleaning stairs), empties itself in the trash can, and avoids pet messes instead of dragging poop all over the floor. Or a laundry system that grabs the basket of dirty laundry (or better yet, picks the close off the floor)…

A Roomba is consumer-grade technology, though. There's a whole different paradigm of manufacturing and production used for i.e. defence, space/aerospace, high-level particle physics at LLNL and so forth. Not really a good metric. Ever read about the National Reconnaissance Office?

I was using "Roomba" as an illustration device. I necessarily wouldn't expect that the technology I described would be available at a consumer price point, but many of those items on my list should be doable with the same technological (AI) advances needed to make off-planet robotics work well (especially ones that are more distance such as on Mars, which need to work more autonomously).

For example, the rovers on Mars, as much as they have accomplished, really haven't done much more in all the time they were there than humans did physically on the Moon 50 years ago.

Re: A new Moon race has begun

#25

Post by em-bee »

0x8BADF00D wrote: post #10
bryanlarsen wrote: post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Landing on the moon in 2024 is far less ridiculous a statement than Kennedy's moon announcement in 1961 was. We can do it, we just don't want to badly enough.

Manned spaceflight and stations are unnecessary in the near term. Autonomous drones and machines can bootstrap colonization. A mining refinery can be bootstrapped easily, all remotely. Then asteroid mining droids will drop their payloads there for refinement and processing.

manned space missions are necessary in order to advance manned spaceflight.

we need the experience from sending 5, 10, etc people there before we can send hundred or more.

we need much more data on the effects of longterm space travel. this kind of experience can not be bootstrapped.

bootstrapping colonization would be worthwhile if we were ready to build a viable colony in the next few decades. but i do not believe we are.

i believe we do not yet have enough data to know if long term space missions are even possible.

getting machines to mars is easy. but getting the experience necessary for human colonization alone will take several decades more before we are ready. we don't need that bootstrapping as much as we need the experience of human spaceflight in order to build a colony.

Re: A new Moon race has begun

#27

Post by [deleted] »

0x8BADF00D wrote: post #10
bryanlarsen wrote: post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Landing on the moon in 2024 is far less ridiculous a statement than Kennedy's moon announcement in 1961 was. We can do it, we just don't want to badly enough.

Manned spaceflight and stations are unnecessary in the near term. Autonomous drones and machines can bootstrap colonization. A mining refinery can be bootstrapped easily, all remotely. Then asteroid mining droids will drop their payloads there for refinement and processing.

[deleted]

Re: A new Moon race has begun

#28

Post by dwaltrip »

0x8BADF00D wrote: post #10
bryanlarsen wrote: post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Landing on the moon in 2024 is far less ridiculous a statement than Kennedy's moon announcement in 1961 was. We can do it, we just don't want to badly enough.

Manned spaceflight and stations are unnecessary in the near term. Autonomous drones and machines can bootstrap colonization. A mining refinery can be bootstrapped easily, all remotely. Then asteroid mining droids will drop their payloads there for refinement and processing.

Unfortunately, robots aren't even close to being smart enough and dexterous enough to carry out complex projects in entirety without the help of humans. We need massive, paradigm-shifting advancements before that can happen.

Re: A new Moon race has begun

#30

Post by dwaltrip »

blackrock wrote: post #26

Who is racing? And why? This just sounds like a lot of waste of money, when they won’t even bother to help people pay their rents.

Technology developed for space will benefit those living on Earth. This happened with the Apollo program and will continue with other programs.

We can and should do multiple things at once.

Post reply on HN