161–170 of 235 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
How do you feel about this probably being most used by bad actors trying to screw with society and elections?
On the other hand, what if this technology was used to influence society and elections in a good way?
if anyone wants to try it, I'm hosting the small model here: https://cocohub.ai/blueprint/blender_pv1/about
Hi there. One of the original authors of the BlenderBot paper here. This cocohub website is not what we released. It appears that cocohub has removed our safety layer and provided other modifications to the bot. We released our model open source, along with specific instructions on interacting with it safely: https://parl.ai/projects/recipes/ It's important to note that dialogue safety is a very important and nuanced…
Cool project by the way. I enjoyed the small version.
Oh I know - what better way to avoid those pesky privacy people by pinning it onto another company.
> Numerous issues arose during longer conversations. Blender would sometimes respond with offensive language, and at other times it would make up facts altogether. I mean, to be fair, I've had many conversations like that...
> Numerous issues arose during longer conversations. Blender would sometimes respond with offensive language, and at other times it would make up facts altogether. I mean, to be fair, I've had many conversations like that...
It’s one of the reasons I refuse to open Reddit anymore, 95% of the comments are insults, made up facts, misinformation or people living in their own bubble and refusing to accept any opinion other than their own.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
that's the rub. every AI sound/word/picture editor i've ran into says something along the lines of "we're releasing this data set to help stay secure in this day and age of easy counterfeiting of X.", but they never really mention how you apply the data in an adversarial way against itself -- they just sort of hand-wave that part. Same with fake AI generated Obama video and sound, and earlier data-set generated chatb…
If its secret or not publicly available people will argue using Occam’s razor or that only “State actors” could use this. With the subtext being your not important enough. With the data public its more akin to driveby ssh login attempts. Not being important doesn’t mean your not under attack and people can take the necessary precautions.
There are few reasonable ways to "take precautions" against nuclear weapons and there are few reasonable ways to "take precautions" against something like this short of swearing off of social media entirely.
Without reasonable defences, all you really accomplish is ramping up proliferation.
Blog post: https://ai.facebook.com/blog/state-of-the-art-open-source-ch... Paper: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2004.13637.pdf Open Source: https://parl.ai/projects/recipes/ Ask us anything, the Facebook team behind it is happy to answer questions here.
I was really blown away by the results you achieved. Amazing work! My jaw hit the floor when I saw the witty farewell "fun guy" quip, and I was in stitches when I read the song about baking. I look forward to the day I can take the model for a spin - unfortunately I don't have the requisite $18,000 hardware ;) I have a few questions: Could this be used as a tool to get a feel for public sentiment? For example, could…
Blog post: https://ai.facebook.com/blog/state-of-the-art-open-source-ch... Paper: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2004.13637.pdf Open Source: https://parl.ai/projects/recipes/ Ask us anything, the Facebook team behind it is happy to answer questions here.
Why do you think that Facebook paid for this research?
I can't help but wonder how Facebook would react if someone created a bot trained off discussions on Facebook.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
It’s one of the reasons I refuse to open Reddit anymore, 95% of the comments are insults, made up facts, misinformation or people living in their own bubble and refusing to accept any opinion other than their own.
The remaining 5% are the same jokes and memes repeated ad nauseam.