Live data from Hacker News

Xcode now costs US$ 4.99

itunes.apple.com

241–250 of 401 posts

Re: Xcode now costs US$ 4.99

#241

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Visual Studio Professional (if you turn up at any Microsoft meeting where they launch a new version of VS): £0

Yay. Free coasters!

I have no problem with the price of Visual Studio, if I'd use Windows. Just setting the record straight with respect to the grandparent post.

The bottom line is that many vendors learnt that to make tools available at a low price point for at least some audiences to capture mindshare.

Re: Xcode now costs US$ 4.99

#242

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That's one hell of an understatement... I just want to relate the experience, not start a flame war. Java tools are pretty darn cool nowadays.

Still, Smalltalk is seriously cool. I think the pricing was only one factor of Java's success. Smalltalk, for the C programmer, is pretty alien. No source files, no compiler... That takes some to get used to. Java provides a nice path towards OOP that's more forgiving than C++, yet, it's aesthetically compatible with C.

Version control also seemed an issue - commercial Smalltalks had tools like Envy - but all the projects I observed in the telecoms world seemed to have a senior developer doing nothing but merging images for the duration of the project.

Re: Xcode now costs US$ 4.99

#243
post #195
post #61

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It all adds up. As you say, there are a zillion of things you need. Not the least a Mac (>= 1000 bucks). If all you want is to learn programming, there are free alternatives to XCode. How much have you spent on iPhone apps so far? I have friends who spent several hundred €, one Happy Meal at a time.

It's required that you buy a new Mac? That's news. I thought you could pick one up used on Craigslist for a few hundred bucks. Oh wait, you can.

Would you say these Craigslist Macs are a good deal? I just found a 500€ plastic MacBook. I don't think that is a good deal.

In any case, you need a Mac, and it's gonna cost you.

Re: Xcode now costs US$ 4.99

#244

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Still, Smalltalk is seriously cool. I think the pricing was only one factor of Java's success. Smalltalk, for the C programmer, is pretty alien. No source files, no compiler... That takes some to get used to. Java provides a nice path towards OOP that's more forgiving than C++, yet, it's aesthetically compatible with C.

Version control also seemed an issue - commercial Smalltalks had tools like Envy - but all the projects I observed in the telecoms world seemed to have a senior developer doing nothing but merging images for the duration of the project.

Indeed. Having source files helps a lot. Smalltalk images suffer from Amish Bread Syndrome. Not being able to build your image from sources and sources alone is disturbing for me and I learned OOP with Smalltalk (later moved to Actor on Windows, but, still, without source code as text files).

Re: Xcode now costs US$ 4.99

#245

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Xcode 3 was included with a $129 dollar OS and only would run on that one or later. Xcode 3.2 was included with a $29 OS and ditto.

Actually you could download Xcode (and the iOS SDKs) for free from Apple's website. It would only run on your $129/$29 OS, but technically you didn't have to use the shipped copy ever .

You can download download Xcode 3.x free if you log in at connect.apple.com, or on the xcode page on developer.apple.com you click on the "Looking for Xcode 3" link:

http://imgur.com/cWRp6 http://imgur.com/8LHXW

This isn't the end of the world, it is not like now you no longer have access to the development tools. I wonder like a lot of people if this has to do with tax laws.

Re: Xcode now costs US$ 4.99

#246

Based on the general sentiment in this thread, I guess the HN community doesn't want people to be able to charge money for software. For some reason I am experiencing cognitive dissonance...

Well, HN seems to also attract a lot of people like me who just want to hack, entrepreneurial nonsense be damned. And I will gladly make my software free and "throw away" all the profit I could make, because I believe I am contributing to a better world.

Not sure why merijnv was downvoted - seems like a pretty reasonable point of view to me.

May I ask how you fund your activities?

Re: Xcode now costs US$ 4.99

#247

I'm surprised this made it to the number 1 spot on the front page. From the Hacker News Guidelines: You can make up a new title if you want, but if you put gratuitous editorial spin on it, the editors may rewrite it. Xcode 4 is available as a free download for Mac and iOS developers with a paid membership [1], just like the versions before it. Those who aren't paying members of ADC can get Xcode 4 via the Mac App Sto…

I am currently paying 18 cents per GB outgoing from Rackspace Cloud. I bet Apple is paying less. Assuming they pay the same, that's 76 cents.

$5 is not offsetting costs.

Re: Xcode now costs US$ 4.99

#249

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I definitely agree with you, having grown up on free tools, but $5 is a lot easier to ask a parent for than $99/year to get access to this kind of stuff.

The $99/year thing is not terrible . I remember saving money from my paper route to buy tools/lib licenses to some specialized things I really wanted. Selling your parents on a single $99 purchase is a lot easier than trying to sell a $5 purchase every week. 'Tis just the way it is. jarin below mentions he wouldn't hesitate buying his kid Xcode for $5... that only works if the parent is in the field also. How many, s…

>"I remember saving money from my paper route to buy tools/lib licenses to some specialized things I really wanted."

Today, a teenager would say, "What's a paper route?"

Re: Xcode now costs US$ 4.99

#250

Xcode 3 appears to still be a free download. Xcode 4 is free if you're a registered developer (which costs $99/year), or $5 from the app store. gcc is obviously still free, if you get it from anyone other than Apple.

Not to mention that a compiler won't do you much good without a linker. MingW and GNU platform systems like most Linux distributions use ld from binutils, but that doesn't support Mach-O so is useless on OS X.
Post reply on HN