Live data from Hacker News

Comparing Covid-19 Deaths to Flu Deaths Is Like Comparing Apples to Oranges

blogs.scientificamerican.com

1–10 of 183 posts

Re: Comparing Covid-19 Deaths to Flu Deaths Is Like Comparing Apples to Oranges

#4
so we go from

>3,448 to 15,620

confirmed deaths to

>25,000 to 69,000

estimated deaths? It's no wonder Americans have trust issues with medical experts. That's an absurd number created just to scare people into getting vaccinated. Which appears to be the authors opinion as well.

> While in the past it was justifiable to err on the side of substantially overestimating flu deaths, in order to encourage vaccination and good hygiene

I feel like trust is entirely undervalued in the scientific community. How are lay people expected to follow scientific advice if we can't trust the scientists?

Re: Comparing Covid-19 Deaths to Flu Deaths Is Like Comparing Apples to Oranges

#8
post #3

Why can't we compare apples and oranges? They're fruit. They have nutritions. I don't like this metaphor.

How about oranges vs lemons? That way they are superficially similar but one is a lot more palatable than the other. Regular coronavirus = eating an orange. SARS-CoV-2 = eating a lemon...

Re: Comparing Covid-19 Deaths to Flu Deaths Is Like Comparing Apples to Oranges

#9
post #3

Why can't we compare apples and oranges? They're fruit. They have nutritions. I don't like this metaphor.

We can, but at the same time it would be different than a comparison of say a granny smith and a gala apple.

Oranges share fundamental properties with apples - they are ”fruits” and ”pip” ones at that, and can be compared as such - but there’s a clear distiction and a reason for the grouping of ”apples” and ”oranges”.

Post reply on HN