Live data from Hacker News

Google Meet premium video meetings–free for everyone

blog.google

51–60 of 255 posts

Re: Google Meet premium video meetings–free for everyone

#51
post #20
post #4

I've been using Google meet as a remote student for a while (Google made meet available for free for education accounts a while ago already) and it's been a great experience, even with large groups of people online. We tested up to ~80 without any problems.

I used Google meet yesterday on a Samsung phone (GS7),and in ~80 minutes almost the entire battery was drained and the phone was too hot to handle. I powered down completely to recharge.

A multi-person video call should be expected to heavily drain a battery. 80 minutes is impressive.

Re: Google Meet premium video meetings–free for everyone

#53
post #40

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why can't be one loyal to an app?

having a concept of "loyalty" for apps and corporations is beyond me

Loyal user is a well-recognised term in marketing among other areas meaning someone who keeps using the product over a long period of time. It's not more complicated than that.

Re: Google Meet premium video meetings–free for everyone

#55
They're late to the party. The canapes have been consumed, the beer has been drunk and everyone's down to that miscellaneous yellow dip and the leftover breadsticks.

Zoom has won, Google, with Teams coming in a respectable 2nd place. No-one's got any reason to use your product.

Re: Google Meet premium video meetings–free for everyone

#56
post #8
post #6

I left Google and the Meet team a while ago. Would have been great to experience this 30x growth though! Being oncall these days would have been interesting. I have used Meet a lot both personally and professionally this spring and I think it's great. Been waiting for this announcement!

I'm a loyal user of hangouts.

[deleted]

Re: Google Meet premium video meetings–free for everyone

#57

> We do not allow anonymous users (i.e., without a Google Account) to join meetings created by individual accounts. If there is no guest accounts this will not be intresting for many.

Agreed. While requiring a Google account to host a meeting makes some sense, requiring an account to join a meeting will simply mean too much friction and users will use another platform. The equation is simple. Users use the first platform they can find where both sound and video works for every person they want to talk to. "Jim can't get into the call" soon leads to someone piping up "shall we try zoom instead?". I…

> It's easy to see how this happened too - all Google engineers have Google accounts

Plus, there was a time when the competition was things like Discord and Skype (force you to have an account... and a desktop application) and Facetime (forces you to have a phone number, and an app, and a particular brand of phone)

Re: Google Meet premium video meetings–free for everyone

#58
post #13

No end-to-end encryption plus forced Google Mail registration preventing anonymity. Yawn, Google. Yaaawn!

Meet supports up to 100 participants. That would be pretty tough to do e2ee. Is there a service that can do that?

Google Duo just announced E2EE for 8 participants.

Re: Google Meet premium video meetings–free for everyone

#59

They're late to the party. The canapes have been consumed, the beer has been drunk and everyone's down to that miscellaneous yellow dip and the leftover breadsticks. Zoom has won, Google, with Teams coming in a respectable 2nd place. No-one's got any reason to use your product.

Teams is growing fast, even being late to the party after Slack.

If Meet really works well, they could grow quickly.

Post reply on HN