Live data from Hacker News

Lyft lays off 17% of workforce, furloughs hundreds more

cnbc.com

421–430 of 595 posts

Re: Lyft lays off 17% of workforce, furloughs hundreds more

#421

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Based on what we've heard from Google yesterday, and FB's Q1 results just now, it looks like the much heralded ad crunch is turning into not much more than a speed bump.

But we need to wait for Q2 results to know the full impact, right?

Yeah, but in Google's earnings call yesterday they said that the situation is stabilizing.

Re: Lyft lays off 17% of workforce, furloughs hundreds more

#422

Earlier quoted context omitted.

His unwillingness to not solve the state's pension problems should be applauded. the amount of unfunded liabilities is in the hundreds of billions of dollars and approaching a trillion if it has not passed that already. This all happened because the number of public servants who are pulling in over 100k has skyrocketed... 100k+ in retirement.. with millions past 50k! Think about that 50k in pay plus medical. These pe…

I ran across that Forbes article yesterday as well... amazing data: "71,000 public employees at every level of Illinois government received six-figure paychecks. Additionally, 23,000 retirees pulled down more than $100,000 in annual pensions."

Illinois also guarantees a 3% COLA regardless of inflation which leads to a doubling of direct pension benefits within 24 years. Not to mention the pension spiking among many administrators in the last four years of employment. It is criminal.

Re: Lyft lays off 17% of workforce, furloughs hundreds more

#423

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There was an interesting piece in this week's Atlantic on the motivation for having states declare bankruptcy: "Under the Constitution, bankruptcy is a power entirely reserved to the federal government. An American bankruptcy is overseen in federal court, by a federal judge, according to federal law. That’s why federal law can allow U.S. cities to go bankrupt, as many have done over the years. That’s why the financia…

His unwillingness to not solve the state's pension problems should be applauded. the amount of unfunded liabilities is in the hundreds of billions of dollars and approaching a trillion if it has not passed that already. This all happened because the number of public servants who are pulling in over 100k has skyrocketed... 100k+ in retirement.. with millions past 50k! Think about that 50k in pay plus medical. These pe…

This is just crazy to me, this public servants takes unprecedented risks and take lower pays so they can take stable retirement.

Now it comes time for due, we don't want to fund these anymore.

The entitlement in HN is just too much.

Re: Lyft lays off 17% of workforce, furloughs hundreds more

#424

There was a person in the Uber thread yesterday who predicted this. I wonder if they’ll go back to hiring if this is over or they’re using as an opportunity to get rid of people they shouldn’t have hired in the first place.

My guess is both, they’re doing some cleanup and will go back to hiring.

Possible. I remember going a Lyft event in mid-2018 and they were telling me that they had just doubled their team size and were looking to double again by the end of the year, so they were certainly hiring fairly quickly then.

Re: Lyft lays off 17% of workforce, furloughs hundreds more

#425
post #37

Uber/airbnb/lyft were considered in the same tier as facebook/google before corona. With google also slowing hiring, are the engineers laid off all going to be absorbed by facebook?

This will play our more like the dotcom burst than the 2008 crisis. For most younger people here this may come as a shock but tech jobs can disappear, for years. The job market in 2019 felt a lot like the job market in 1999, people rushing to get upskilled so that they could get into software and make ridiculous money. After the dotcom burst huge number of people left tech, or at least left the world of software deve…

Would this be a bad time to be in a job hunt to change companies? Anticipating that there may be a cohort of newly laid off SWEs from prestigious brand-name companies (Uber, Lyft, potentially others) flooding the market?

I'm guessing I, as a lowly, humble, SWE from an investment bank, would be easily looked over in favor of those aforementioned veterans/alumni of highly regarded Silicon Valley companies. Unless if I make a lateral jump to another bank or hedge fund, which I have no desire to do so.

Re: Lyft lays off 17% of workforce, furloughs hundreds more

#426
post #405

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Many pensions are not the "have $27k/yr starting at age 67" kind, but the "have $100k/yr + benefits starting at age 55" kind. Its the latter that people find upsetting - nothing close to poverty level.

Sure, but people took those jobs in large part because of those pensions. It is part of the entire compensation package. They often times took less money up front in return for better pensions. The problem is that this was not properly budgeted for when funding the pensions.

"They often times took less money up front in return for better pensions."

That is no longer the case when compared with comparable private sector jobs since at least the early 2000s in many parts of the country.

Re: Lyft lays off 17% of workforce, furloughs hundreds more

#427

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There was an interesting piece in this week's Atlantic on the motivation for having states declare bankruptcy: "Under the Constitution, bankruptcy is a power entirely reserved to the federal government. An American bankruptcy is overseen in federal court, by a federal judge, according to federal law. That’s why federal law can allow U.S. cities to go bankrupt, as many have done over the years. That’s why the financia…

I don't understand how someone can love their political party as much as Mitch McConnell does. It's party before all else. I don't get it. At all.

https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2020/04/20/how-mitch-mcco... is an interesting read related to this.

Re: Lyft lays off 17% of workforce, furloughs hundreds more

#428

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's a strategy/ideology he's been rewarded for following?

But this isn't a game. It has real consequences.

It is a game. The consequences are varied, but for McConnell they are generational wealth, the self-satisfaction of entrenching Republican values in the Federal court system for at least another generation and the destruction of senatorial traditions that were centuries old.

Re: Lyft lays off 17% of workforce, furloughs hundreds more

#429

Earlier quoted context omitted.

His unwillingness to not solve the state's pension problems should be applauded. the amount of unfunded liabilities is in the hundreds of billions of dollars and approaching a trillion if it has not passed that already. This all happened because the number of public servants who are pulling in over 100k has skyrocketed... 100k+ in retirement.. with millions past 50k! Think about that 50k in pay plus medical. These pe…

This is just crazy to me, this public servants takes unprecedented risks and take lower pays so they can take stable retirement. Now it comes time for due, we don't want to fund these anymore. The entitlement in HN is just too much.

What risk is an accountant sitting in SF City Hall taking? High risk positions - sure give them more security. Otherwise, treat them like everyone else. Also, people goto govt jobs because of job security as well - which is also a factor in lower income.

Re: Lyft lays off 17% of workforce, furloughs hundreds more

#430

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There was an interesting piece in this week's Atlantic on the motivation for having states declare bankruptcy: "Under the Constitution, bankruptcy is a power entirely reserved to the federal government. An American bankruptcy is overseen in federal court, by a federal judge, according to federal law. That’s why federal law can allow U.S. cities to go bankrupt, as many have done over the years. That’s why the financia…

This is a pretty grim path to follow. If States are to go bankrupt and subject to federal imposition of what debts must be paid, then it may push States to seek further sovereignity. An example being pressure to mint their currency. This is currently banned in the constitution, but if things get dire... they could simply ignore?

[deleted]
Post reply on HN