When Monks Went Undercover to Steal Relics
daily.jstor.org
When Monks Went Undercover to Steal Relics
1–7 of 7 posts
Re: When Monks Went Undercover to Steal Relics
#2Re: When Monks Went Undercover to Steal Relics
#3(I like the Umberto Eco comment in "the name of the rose" about the head of John The Baptist as a child being on display at another church)
Re: When Monks Went Undercover to Steal Relics
#4Unless they kept stealing during a Sabbath. That would make a still impressive 4/10.
Re: When Monks Went Undercover to Steal Relics
#5It's a great game for an online social event, because you have to commit to the 2+ hours it is going to take to play. A lot of online games nowadays are optimized from dropping in and out amongst a pool of random people, but AoE makes you do the work to get people involved and stick to that commitment.
Re: When Monks Went Undercover to Steal Relics
#6The last bit was interesting:
"... the most important explanation is a theological one. Because relics were infused with the living presence of a saint, capable of working miracles, they were perfectly able to stop a thief. Any relic that didn’t wish to be moved could simply become too heavy to lift, or cause all the doors of the church to spontaneously lock. By this logic, if a relic was stolen, it wanted to be."
It reminds me of the stories Buddhist relics (not necessarily Tibetan) that was similar. Though in those cases, they involved thieves bent on stealing it for personal gain and somehow would get into a series of coincidences that lead to its recovery.
Re: When Monks Went Undercover to Steal Relics
#7I've been revisiting the game Age of Empires with my friends while keeping at home. Today I learned that even that part of the game mechanic stems from some research! It's a great game for an online social event, because you have to commit to the 2+ hours it is going to take to play. A lot of online games nowadays are optimized from dropping in and out amongst a pool of random people, but AoE makes you do the work to…