Live data from Hacker News

De-Googling: My Progress

geekgonecrazy.com

261–270 of 348 posts

Re: De-Googling: My Progress

#261

My De-Googling process: *Search(1) -> DuckDuckGo *Gmail(2) -> Fastmail *Android -> SailfishOS (https://sailfishos.org/) *Maps -> OpenStreetMaps *Youtube(3) -> Youtube-dl, "subscriptions" with rss-feeds *Drive -> Self-hosted Nextloud & Syncthing *Calendar -> At first Fastmail, but nowadays back to paper calendar *Chrome -> Brave & Firefox (1) When having problems finding I sometimes check Google Search with bangs. (2)…

"How I moved out of a house and learned to live in a van down by the river"

Re: De-Googling: My Progress

#262
post #239

A lot of people praise DDG and I'm also one using it as a default search engine, but it's not exactly clear how much independent it is. I've started to consider using Cliqz ( https://cliqz.com/ ) as an alternative or at least a parallel experiment; they claim to be totally independent and to care for user privacy at least as much as DDG does. Does any other HNer have experience with their search result ? I'm still no…

I've been using DDG pretty exclusively for over a year, and I have no complaints. It also handles pretty tough searches reasonably well. Maybe I'm not a power user or whatever, but DDG works so well for me I'm not even enticed by Google's search (especially w/ the redesigns). I think of it less as a "real" search engine and more of a data gathering trap--meaning that aspect of it is more significant than its search result quality.

Re: De-Googling: My Progress

#263

Firefox is now objectively better than Chrome in every way. I would recommend switching moral reasons aside. Chrome's memory management is abysmal. I now get the same shudder when I see someone with chrome on their machine that I used to get when I saw someone running Internet Explorer (which may even be better than chrome now too).

I'm a diehard Firefox fan, but I will be honest: its JS and rendering performance is garbage compared to Chrome.

I play games and use complex web apps (GCloud, Office 365) exclusively in Chromium

Re: De-Googling: My Progress

#265

For photos storage and sharing you may want to check pCloud. They offer lifetime plan at $350 for 2TB. I'm in no way related; just a happy customer. https://www.pcloud.com/cloud-storage-pricing-plans.html

After having n photo startups (paid and free) disappear into the mist, along with my photos and videos, I decided self-hosting was the only thing I could trust. I couldn't find any software that would reliably scale to my library and fix my mess of duplicates and bitrot files, so I made it. I'm providing access to the beta for free in exchange for feedback, if you'd like to try it. https://photostructure.com/about/v-…

Kudos to author! Seems like lots of hard work and dedication went into your software. Respect.

Re: De-Googling: My Progress

#266
post #264

I am surprised that nextcloud isn't cited in this article. It could effectively replace iCloud, hackmd (maybe) and has calendaring features too.

The author mentions it twice: under Contacts/Calendar "I’m thinking about using nextcloud." and under Docs "Nextcloud might fill this gap. But I don’t feel a void to fill right now."

Re: De-Googling: My Progress

#267

Firefox is now objectively better than Chrome in every way. I would recommend switching moral reasons aside. Chrome's memory management is abysmal. I now get the same shudder when I see someone with chrome on their machine that I used to get when I saw someone running Internet Explorer (which may even be better than chrome now too).

As a longtime firefox user, I don't think this is true. At best it's a choice thing, I haven't run into memory issues in Chrome in a long time.

And IE being better than (any browser)? Let's not get carried away. They still have multiple zero day vulnerabilities discovered every year.

Re: De-Googling: My Progress

#268

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I never read Google discriminates between paying customers before. That's such a wild accusation that it requires serious evidence. Edit: I can reply anymore but just supply a link of data handling discrimination between paying customers because that's what you imply by "there is not difference between GSuite customers and normal gmail". It's bullshit https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT202303

You're correct in that Google doesn't discriminate between paying and non-paying customers: It happily abuses the privacy of it's paying customers too. Many of Google's uses of data are not specific to whether or not someone is using G Suite or consumer Gmail as far as I am aware.

What Gmail data is being abused?

Re: De-Googling: My Progress

#269

Firefox is now objectively better than Chrome in every way. I would recommend switching moral reasons aside. Chrome's memory management is abysmal. I now get the same shudder when I see someone with chrome on their machine that I used to get when I saw someone running Internet Explorer (which may even be better than chrome now too).

Developer Tools in Firefox are horrendous to use compared to Chrome.

Re: De-Googling: My Progress

#270

Firefox is now objectively better than Chrome in every way. I would recommend switching moral reasons aside. Chrome's memory management is abysmal. I now get the same shudder when I see someone with chrome on their machine that I used to get when I saw someone running Internet Explorer (which may even be better than chrome now too).

I'm a diehard Firefox fan, but I will be honest: its JS and rendering performance is garbage compared to Chrome. I play games and use complex web apps (GCloud, Office 365) exclusively in Chromium

> I'm a diehard Firefox fan, but I will be honest

No, you are not. You are a Google marketing tool.

And this is not ad-hominem from my side, since you made a claim about yourself the main part of your argument.

Google is known for intentionally crippling Firefox performance on their services. That doesn't make Firefox itself slower.

Post reply on HN