Live data from Hacker News

Ampyx Power: Wind energy systems using tethered wings above 200 meters

ampyxpower.com

11–20 of 41 posts

Re: Ampyx Power: Wind energy systems using tethered wings above 200 meters

#11

I wonder how closely these can be deployed? Safe operation might require large distances between base stations. If they can't beat conventional wind mills in power per area, that may be a deal breaker in many scenarios.

You can put them in the water with just an anchored buoy.

Then you have to connect them all with sea cables, those add up if you need another km for every base you install.

Re: Ampyx Power: Wind energy systems using tethered wings above 200 meters

#12

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You can put them in the water with just an anchored buoy.

Then you have to connect them all with sea cables, those add up if you need another km for every base you install.

Yes, preferably not too deep water. Still better than trying to keep a windmill-like turbine upright (those exist, but look complicated https://www.sierraclub.org/sites/www.sierraclub.org/files/st... ).

edit: oh you mean for the electricity, yes...

Re: Ampyx Power: Wind energy systems using tethered wings above 200 meters

#13
It looks like a lot of the cost and complexity is to allow takeoff and landing. Is anyone working on a system where the flying part never lands? You presumably have to supply some energy to keep it aloft on windless days, but that might be cheaper than landing gear.

Re: Ampyx Power: Wind energy systems using tethered wings above 200 meters

#14
I think I am missing something here, because I don't quite get how the wind does continual work on the device to generate power. I mean, at the start the device goes downwind unreeling a tether, so it is pulling on the tether and doing work, so far so good. Then it reaches the maximum extent and... starts more or less staying where it is, staying aloft? Okay. But it's not systematically moving, so no longer doing work. What am I missing?

Re: Ampyx Power: Wind energy systems using tethered wings above 200 meters

#15

I think I am missing something here, because I don't quite get how the wind does continual work on the device to generate power. I mean, at the start the device goes downwind unreeling a tether, so it is pulling on the tether and doing work, so far so good. Then it reaches the maximum extent and... starts more or less staying where it is, staying aloft? Okay. But it's not systematically moving, so no longer doing wor…

I don't know anymore than what was on their site, but my reading of it was that it works by moving the airframe (plane? glider?) around in the wind-stream. The tether would then be continuously moving back and forth (or in and out). I think this the meaning behind the figure-eight pattern they show.

If it's anything like some ocean wave generators, it might be able to generate power when moving in either direction, but I'm not sure about that.

Re: Ampyx Power: Wind energy systems using tethered wings above 200 meters

#17
post #13

It looks like a lot of the cost and complexity is to allow takeoff and landing. Is anyone working on a system where the flying part never lands? You presumably have to supply some energy to keep it aloft on windless days, but that might be cheaper than landing gear.

It would need maintenance eventually.

Re: Ampyx Power: Wind energy systems using tethered wings above 200 meters

#18

I wonder how closely these can be deployed? Safe operation might require large distances between base stations. If they can't beat conventional wind mills in power per area, that may be a deal breaker in many scenarios.

I wonder how close to humans they can be deployed. I'd guess that thing can fly quite a distance before it comes crashing down in case anything breaks.

Re: Ampyx Power: Wind energy systems using tethered wings above 200 meters

#19

I think I am missing something here, because I don't quite get how the wind does continual work on the device to generate power. I mean, at the start the device goes downwind unreeling a tether, so it is pulling on the tether and doing work, so far so good. Then it reaches the maximum extent and... starts more or less staying where it is, staying aloft? Okay. But it's not systematically moving, so no longer doing wor…

Imagine for a moment that you built a wind turbine generator with just one blade. Instead of two other blades, you just had a counterweight. Then replace the tower and hub with a tether, and drop the counterweight.

That's effectively what these technologies are doing.

In point of fact, all of the blades on a commercial wind turbine are shaped like wings, such that the reaction force of the air flowing over the wing acts to drive the wing in the direction of motion and adds a drag force away from the tether.

In the classical tower arrangement, you extract energy by opposing the rotation of the blade about the tower. In the energy kite arrangement, you extract energy by running the "propellors" in reverse as generators to oppose the forward thrust.

Re: Ampyx Power: Wind energy systems using tethered wings above 200 meters

#20
post #10

Cleantechnica had a writer who spent some time taking a closer look at the claims made by companies in this space, a couple of links: https://cleantechnica.com/2020/02/21/rip-google-makani-perha... https://cleantechnica.com/2014/02/19/googles-makani-regulato...

> The only press they ever received was from credulous buzztech sites that just wanted something flashy to grab eyeballs, so they weren’t used to anyone actually being engaged enough intellectually to point out the lack of clothes that they were wearing. I love the way this is written.
Post reply on HN