Anyone that responds to this thread legally agrees to surrender all intellectual property posted or mentioned by them in any manner on the internet messaging forum hackernews located at news dot ycombinator dot com, hereunder referred to as the interweb place, will be the sole property of hpoe and those he chooses to designate. These terms may not be modified, altered, or amended except with written agreement of both…
What if I end all my comments with: © Pier25 Huh? Checkmate!
Disney claims anyone using a Twitter hashtag is agreeing to their terms of use
51–60 of 366 posts
Re: Disney claims anyone using a Twitter hashtag is agreeing to their terms of use
#52If I understand disneytermsofuse.com correctly and I am not a lawyer, they’re claiming #MayThe4th is a Disney Product under the terms therein? Or that the Twitter account is a Disney Product? Because the terms say: > The Disney Products may ask for or allow you to communicate, submit, upload or otherwise make available text, chats, images, audio, video, contest entries or other content (“User Generated Content”), whi…
Re: Disney claims anyone using a Twitter hashtag is agreeing to their terms of use
#53At a rummage sale a few years ago, I bought a book published by Disney in the 1960s or 1970s which had instructions on how to make Mickey Mouse puppets. It also said to "have fun" making them. Selling things for a profit is a lot of fun. As far as I'm concerned, I now have a perpetual, transferable license to make and sell Mickey Mouse puppets. I even asked a lawyer.
Re: Disney claims anyone using a Twitter hashtag is agreeing to their terms of use
#54Earlier quoted context omitted.
For it not to be held up, someone has to take Disney to court and win. Good luck with that. It's the whole single-digit millionaires don't have effective access to legal system , turned up to 11. I can only see a double-digit billionaire having the resources to fight this to the end.
I have an anecdote about this. I worked at Disney for some time and a coworker was an avid 2nd amendment person. They left their firearm in their car as is legal for any employer with a very short list of exceptions. I think munitions development is one of the exceptions, and Disney qualifies because of their massive fireworks shows. I'm very foggy on these details as it's been many years since. Anyways, he was chatt…
Re: Disney claims anyone using a Twitter hashtag is agreeing to their terms of use
#55Community manager trying to create buzz imho
Because I don't think this is coming across as good press on its own.
Re: Disney claims anyone using a Twitter hashtag is agreeing to their terms of use
#56Just for #MayThe4th? It would be a real stretch in the first place if they made this statement about #MayThe4thBeWithYou, but just #MayThe4th???
Makes me want to set up a twitter bot that tweets things that are purposely against Disney's bullshit TOS and tags it with #MayThe4th.
Re: Disney claims anyone using a Twitter hashtag is agreeing to their terms of use
#57Re: Disney claims anyone using a Twitter hashtag is agreeing to their terms of use
#58At a rummage sale a few years ago, I bought a book published by Disney in the 1960s or 1970s which had instructions on how to make Mickey Mouse puppets. It also said to "have fun" making them. Selling things for a profit is a lot of fun. As far as I'm concerned, I now have a perpetual, transferable license to make and sell Mickey Mouse puppets. I even asked a lawyer.
I'm not sure that would pass the "meeting of minds" test of contract law...
Re: Disney claims anyone using a Twitter hashtag is agreeing to their terms of use
#59Earlier quoted context omitted.
Makes me want to set up a twitter bot that tweets things that are purposely against Disney's bullshit TOS and tags it with #MayThe4th.
#winniethepooh #taiwaneseindependence #MayThe4th
Re: Disney claims anyone using a Twitter hashtag is agreeing to their terms of use
#60Update from Disney: > The above legal language applies ONLY to replies to this tweet using #MayThe4th and mentioning @DisneyPlus . These replies may appear in something special on May the 4th! https://twitter.com/disneyplus/status/1254849654585323525 ... as if that's really any better.
The new clarification is absolutely better to not claim ownership over the entire hashtag, but it is questionable to claim in one tweet that any replies made to a different tweet are an agreement to a private TOS.