Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: What scientific phenomenon do you wish someone would explain better?

news.ycombinator.com

531–540 of 839 posts

Re: Ask HN: What scientific phenomenon do you wish someone would explain better?

#531

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Even diffusion isn't some magical force guiding chemicals through the medium. It's just random movement that statistically results in the chemical being spread out. This is the same principle that the 2nd law of thermodynamics is based upon. There's nothing magic to it, it's just the statistically likely end result over many particles.

Yes. It's interesting how powerful and clarifying this model of its-all-just-atoms-bumping-into-atoms is. It's interesting how many people take science courses, but don't really get this. In the context of Covid19, I see so many people wearing PPE, but failing to act as though they understand that the actual goal is to prevent this tiny virion dust from entering your orifices. Like wearing gloves and a mask, but then…

People understand 'germs' we don't live in a magical culture. It's not that they don't understand contamination they just haven't thought far enough ahead when they adjust their mask.

Re: Ask HN: What scientific phenomenon do you wish someone would explain better?

#533

If I buy a stock, does the price at which I agreed to buy it become the new share price on the stock exchange? Every article on "Where do stock prices come from?" seems to just talk at a high level about supply and demand. But where does the price come from at a nitty-gritty level? Is it an average of all existing offers or something? Do different exchanges and stock-ticker websites have different formula for calcula…

I think the other answers have been good at explaining HOW stock prices are determined at the exchange, but if you're wondering WHY someone would say "That stock is worth $xx.xx", then that's a more complicated question, with equally complicate answers. At the very lowest level, it could be gut feelings from a potential buyer. They see electric cars more frequently, combustion engines going out of fashion, and simply…

> On a higher level, some potential buyer will look at the companies financial statements, and figure out if the share price is too high / low for how the company is performing, from a financial standpoint. This is called "fundamental analysis", and you can easily find step-by-step analysis reports of such on various companies.

How does this work if a company doesn't pay out dividends? There's no investment to return unless someone buys from you at the same or higher price... right?

Re: Ask HN: What scientific phenomenon do you wish someone would explain better?

#534
Basic probability. How come when I flip a coin it is just as likely to come up heads or tails even if it has just been heads 5 times in a row?

I understand the physical properties of the coin make it so it is an independent event but if I were to run the experiment multiple times the number of times it would be heads after 5 heads would not be an even probability, it would be unlikely since 6 heads in a row is a rare event.

Re: Ask HN: What scientific phenomenon do you wish someone would explain better?

#535

Fourier Transforms. I'd wish I had a intuitive understanding of how they work. Until then I'm stuck with just believing that the magic works out.

The best way to understand the Fourier transformations is to think of them as change-of-basis operations, like we do in linear algebra. Specifically a change from the "time basis" (normal functions) to the "frequency basis" (consisting of a family of orthonormal functions). Here is the chapter on Fourier transforms from my linear algebra book that goes into more details: https://minireference.com/static/excerpts/four…

Sure but the hard part to understand and accept is that ANY squiggle can be represented by a weighted sum of sinusoids...I mean, that's really an amazing insight, and I don't think it's obvious even after-the-fact. Forget about the details of computing coefficients - just the fact that it works at all remains counter-intuitive to me. (A neat visualization would ask the user to wiggle their mouse, producing a sparkline of some finite length, and then, in real-time, update a frequency domain representation of the motion, perhaps represented as a bunch of connected circles that rotate steadily but at different rates to produce an equivalent graph)

Re: Ask HN: What scientific phenomenon do you wish someone would explain better?

#536

Basic probability. How come when I flip a coin it is just as likely to come up heads or tails even if it has just been heads 5 times in a row? I understand the physical properties of the coin make it so it is an independent event but if I were to run the experiment multiple times the number of times it would be heads after 5 heads would not be an even probability, it would be unlikely since 6 heads in a row is a rare…

Yeah, but 5 heads followed by 1 tail is also a rare event. Basically, after drawing 5 heads you have a choice between two rare events which are equally probable. The same after drawing anything else, not just 5 heads.

Re: Ask HN: What scientific phenomenon do you wish someone would explain better?

#537

• Magnetism. There are plenty of videos out there calling it the result of a relativistic charge imbalance. But I've never been able to use this point-of-view to practical use cases like understanding how permanent magnets work or how increasing the number of windings in inductors boosts the magnetic field strength. There were more situations I tried to put this POV into use but I can't remember them off the top of m…

The issue with wave-particle duality is that most of us think about it backwards.

The universe is actually made of quantized fields. Both particles and waves are imprecise models/approximations. There's no such thing as a particle, instead there are just excitations of this field which we cannot measure with complete accuracy.

Re: Ask HN: What scientific phenomenon do you wish someone would explain better?

#538
post #520

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No it doesn't. You know that the result of the computation for an individual qubit will be either 0 or 1 (otherwise it would be useless -- measuring only gives you one bit of information), so you construct the system such that after the computation is done each qubit will be aligned with the |+z> or whatever axis. The key point is that you have to be clever about how you construct the system for a given QC algorithm,…

OK but we're back on square one. If you can't read info from qbits without breaking the state of the whole freaking system then what exactly is that you reading? Doesn't the alignment info collapses superposition?

You do "break the state of the whole freaking system". Once you've read the output, you're done. You have to set up your initial state again and run the computation from scratch.

Re: Ask HN: What scientific phenomenon do you wish someone would explain better?

#539
post #469

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'd assume it's the speed advantage, but the only problem I can think of that would require that type of exponential speed is cracking hashing algorithms which just seems destructive and counterproductive, like building a digital nuclear bomb - and from my very limited understanding that's a long ways off from being achieved. I assume there's probably many more complex computational problems outside of my domain that…

Many problems require lots of huge matrix multiplications—think simulations of physical systems, i.e. weather systems or molecular interactions, or numerical optimization.

Additionally, many problems are can be converted to matrix operations, like graph algorithms.

Note that matrix multiplication takes O(n^2) time with a quantum computer, but O(n^2.807) time on a classical computer.

Re: Ask HN: What scientific phenomenon do you wish someone would explain better?

#540
post #119

I would like to understand how cellular biology processes actually work. Like, how do all the right modules and proteins line up in the right orientation every time? Every time I watch animations, it seems like the proteins and such just magically appear when needed and disappear when not needed [0]. Sometimes it's an ultra-complex looking protein and it just magically flys over to the DNA, attaches to the correct sp…

A friend of mine showed me this writeup when I asked a similar question, and it helps to clear up a lot of the "magic" movement:

http://www.righto.com/2011/07/cells-are-very-fast-and-crowde...

But in a nutshell, the animations are heavily idealized, showing the process when it succeeds, slowing it way, way down, and totally ignoring 90% of the other nearby material so you can see what's going on. Then you remember that you have just a bajillion of cells within you, all containing this incredibly complex machinery and... it's really kindof humbling just how little we actually know about any of it. Not to discredit the biologists and scientists for whom this is their life's work; we've made incredible amounts of progress over the last century. It's just... we're peeking at molecular machinery that is so very small, and moves so quickly that it's nigh impossible to observe in realtime.

Post reply on HN