Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: What scientific phenomenon do you wish someone would explain better?

news.ycombinator.com

271–280 of 839 posts

Re: Ask HN: What scientific phenomenon do you wish someone would explain better?

#271

Why tardigrades are so hardy, how their biology is so different? How immune system and medications work. Why some plastics are recyclable and others are not.

All plastics are recyclable in the sense that they can be repurposed, but thermoset polymers cannot be repurposed to be used the same way as it was originally formed. Typically they are chopped up and used as matrix materials for asphalt or other composites. In some cases they can use solvents to break down chains into smaller building blocks. However, colloquially thermoset polymers are considered non-recyclable, while thermoplastic polymers are considered recyclable.

The difference between thermoset and thermoplastic polymers has to do with irreversible chemical bonding during curing. With thermosets, you have chemical bonds between molecules preventing deformation, whereas with thermoplastics, you just have a viscous friction between molecules that varies with temperature. If you heat up a thermoplastic, that viscous friction goes away and the plastic can be remolded.

Re: Ask HN: What scientific phenomenon do you wish someone would explain better?

#272
Reminds me of a story:

A guy was walking along the beach and found a lamp. Of course he rubs the lamp, and sure enough a genie appears.

Genie: master of the lamp I can grant you a wish, you may wish for anything.

Guy: Wait, isn't it supposed to be 3 wishes?

Genie: One or nothing, and do not wish for more wishes.

Guy thinks for a while ....

You know I have pretty much everything I need. But I have always wanted to travel to Hawaii. But I get sea sick and am afraid to fly.

Genie: Very well I will take you there.

Guy: No no, if you take me there, I wont be able to come back. And what about next year? Since I only get one wish, I want a bridge built to Hawaii.

Genie: That does not make any sense. Please make a different wish. One that does not involve so much construction.

Guy: hmmmm you know I know, can you explain women?

Genie: So do you want the bridge to be a suspension bridge or truss? and how many lanes ....

Re: Ask HN: What scientific phenomenon do you wish someone would explain better?

#274

Earlier quoted context omitted.

So can they still do traditional deterministic(?) calculations? Or would that be somewhat akin to using machine learning to do your taxes; possible but just overkill? I've often heard it said that Quantum Computers can crack cryptographic keys by trying all the possible inputs for a hashing algorithm or something handwavey like that. Are they just spitting out "probable" solutions then? Do you still have to try a han…

Here's what Scott Aaronson says in regard to "trying all the possible inputs": https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17425474

[deleted]

Re: Ask HN: What scientific phenomenon do you wish someone would explain better?

#275

Hawking Radiation. I know just enough to know that the story of "anti-particle of virtual pairs happens to always fall in the hole" is a Lie Told To Children, but the explanations seem to go straight from there to rather dense math and I've never wrapped my head around it.

That's not even a lies-to-children explanation--it's just straight-up wrong, a result of generations of "science journalists" misunderstanding stuff and spreading their misunderstandings around.

Hawking radiation does not discriminate between matter and anti-matter. Either form of any type of particle can be emitted.

Re: Ask HN: What scientific phenomenon do you wish someone would explain better?

#276
Absorption spectra baffle me and I've never seen an explanation that helps me understand.

It seems conceptually simple, except the requirement that the energy of an photon exactly match some required energy in order to be absorbed seems really unlikely, since photon energy not a discrete quantity, and varies according to doppler effects and other things.

It seems like the vast majority of photons would just fly through the universe without interacting with anything, unless there are other ways for photons to interact with matter besides being absorbed. (If there are other ways, they are seemingly never mentioned as a potential alternative fate for the photon).

Re: Ask HN: What scientific phenomenon do you wish someone would explain better?

#277

Quantum Computers. Not like I'm five, but like I'm a software engineer who has a pretty decent understanding of how a classical turing machine works. I can't tell you how many times I've heard someone say "qubits are like bits except they don't have to be just 1 or 0" without providing any coherent explanation of how that's useful. I've also heard that they can try every possible solution to a problem. What I don't u…

Entanglement and interference are computing resources like SPACE, or TIME, with space and time still being represented, because quantum computation is a superset of normal computation (according to the quantum church turing thesis).

The substrate of quantum computing enables quantum parallelism (a register equally likely to be all possible integers, for example) and quantum interference (operations that can funnel such values).

Re: Ask HN: What scientific phenomenon do you wish someone would explain better?

#278

I don't know if this would be my "one question" if I could ask the most brilliant minds in science, but something that always bothered me: When I took physics they basically said "at first scientists were disturbed by the fact that magnets imply that two objects are interacting without any physical contact, but then Faraday came along and said 'the magnets are actually connected by invisible magnetic field lines' and…

It changes the problem from one of action at a distance to local interaction. Instead of "field lines", I would say "field". Field lines are just one way of visualizing a field.

So, if we don't have the notion of fields, then we have a kind of situation of how does object A know about remote object B. Like how does one object know about the motions of literally every other object in the Universe. Perplexing.

Once you come up with the idea of a field, okay you have to at some level accept that there are fields that permeate all of space. But what this intellectual cost buys you is that now an object only has to sense the field local to it to respond to all objects in the universe.

Think of objects bobbing on the ocean. One way to conceptualize that is that any object anywhere could cause this object here to bob in some way. How does this object know about all the other objects? Instead we could say that there is ocean everywhere. Locally, objects bobbing put ripples into the ocean. Locally, ripples cause objects to bob. Each object no longer needs to "know about" every other object it just needs to react to the ripples at its location, and the ripples get sent out from its location.

Does this help?

Re: Ask HN: What scientific phenomenon do you wish someone would explain better?

#279

Quantum Computers. Not like I'm five, but like I'm a software engineer who has a pretty decent understanding of how a classical turing machine works. I can't tell you how many times I've heard someone say "qubits are like bits except they don't have to be just 1 or 0" without providing any coherent explanation of how that's useful. I've also heard that they can try every possible solution to a problem. What I don't u…

There’s an O’Reilly book on Programing Quantum Computers that explains it really well. Bonus: it was written by Batman.

Re: Ask HN: What scientific phenomenon do you wish someone would explain better?

#280
* Lie algebras and Lie groups - I still don't understand this, what they're used for or how to use them in any practical sense.

* Galois Theory - I have a basic understanding of abstract algebra but for some reason Galois theory confounds me, especially as it relates to the inability of radical solutions to fifth and higher degree polynomials

* "State-of-the-art" Quantum Entanglement experiments and their purported success in closing all loopholes

* Babai's proof on graph isomorphism being (almost/effectively) in P - specifically how it might relate to other areas of group actions etc.

* Low density parity checks and other algorithms for reaching the Shannon entropy limit for communication over noisy channels

* Hash functions and their success as one-way(ish)/trapdoor(ish) functions - is SHA-2 believed to be secure because a lot of people threw stuff at the wall to see what stuck or is there a theoretical backpinning that allows people to design these hashes with some degree of certainty that they are irreversible?

Post reply on HN