When U.S. air force discovered the flaw of averages (2016)
1–10 of 116 posts
Re: When U.S. air force discovered the flaw of averages (2016)
#2Daniels published his findings in a 1952 Air Force Technical Note entitled The “Average Man”?
Re: When U.S. air force discovered the flaw of averages (2016)
#3It was an interesting book. Recommend it to anyone who finds the article interesting.
Re: When U.S. air force discovered the flaw of averages (2016)
#4Re: When U.S. air force discovered the flaw of averages (2016)
#5And not just folks in Micronesia or whatever. Heck my business partner hasn't got a deliverable street address - no mailbox at his house. He has a PO box. Is a nightmare getting Amazon deliveries that aren't lost, or left in the bushes, or returned undeliverable.
Anyway, yes, there is no average person.
Re: When U.S. air force discovered the flaw of averages (2016)
#6> any system designed around the average person is doomed to fail. Daniels published his findings in a 1952 Air Force Technical Note entitled The “Average Man”?
Re: When U.S. air force discovered the flaw of averages (2016)
#7Re: When U.S. air force discovered the flaw of averages (2016)
#8This kind of thing can happen even when only measuring a single dimension, if the distribution is multimodal. If everyone is either really short or really tall, then nobody will be near the average height.
Re: When U.S. air force discovered the flaw of averages (2016)
#9Note that this is not some sort of unexpected effect due to humans not behaving mathematically ideally; this is what happens when your intuitions about 1, 2 and 3 dimensions are applied to higher dimensional spaces. Consider the goal of being in the middle 50% of a random value on one dimension; you have a 50% chance. But if you have two dimensions, and you want to be in the middle 50% for both of them, it's a 25% ch…
Another way to think about it is the often-cited unit n-dimensional sphere. If you were to uniformly sample points from within this n-dimensional sphere, as n increased, the proportion of points lying near the surface of the sphere would increase.
Re: When U.S. air force discovered the flaw of averages (2016)
#10> Less than 40 of the 3,864 contestants were average size on just five of the nine dimensions and none of the contestants — not even Martha Skidmore — came close on all nine dimensions.
This seems more an issue of the "curse of dimensionality"[0] more than the "flaw of averages". Be very wary when you are trying to draw conclusions from a dataset with many dimensions.