Just tried upgrading on WSL and I got an endless loop of sleep: cannot read realtime clock: Invalid argument Ctrl+C and then I get $ sudo apt --fix-broken install ... Setting up libc6:amd64 (2.31-0ubuntu9) ... Checking for services that may need to be restarted... Checking init scripts... Nothing to restart. sleep: cannot read realtime clock: Invalid argument dpkg: error processing package libc6:amd64 (--configure):…
For the life of me I don't get how people always say upgrades are so easy on Ubuntu. They do? I just assume that I have to do a backup of my data, wipe the disk and install they new version. Ubuntu updates never worked for me.
Canonical wisdom is to have separate / and /home so you can wipe system easily.
I upgraded by grepping for the packages that were breaking resolution and removing them. But I already know the failure mode so that whole thing took a few minutes.
While I would agree it's certainly not insignificant, fractional means, say, 1.5.x. A nice high-resolution display will be 2x, which will generally result in a nicer experience (largely due to how software deals with it or not). Now many people do indeed have displays where a fractional multiplier works better, but as a buying rec - try to avoid them.
The nice 2x high-resolution display is generally significantly more expensive (just compare 4k and 5k displays at 27’’), so the advice isn’t wrong, it’s just not very practical.
> just compare 4k and 5k displays at 27’’
I have one of these, a Samsung U28E590D which I'm very happy with in every way. That thing cost me 220 € (purchased in Germany), so I don't see what's particularly expensive about 4K 27" displays at this point unless you have some very particular requirements about shortest possible reaction time or precise color calibration.
Most reviews are very positive. Faster, better, Amazon removed, maybe the best Ubuntu release until now. The only 'con' is the pushing of Snap packages. It looks like deb files only can be installed via the terminal. Ubuntu is also researching if they can get Adobe on board. I doubt this would ever happen, but that would be huge. Most people stick on Windows and MacOS because Adobe software is not available on Linux.…
Snaps are significantly safer for users and easier for publishers to produce. The styling issues and so forth occur because of a security-first mindset. [Disclaimer: work for Canonical, but not on the Snapcraft team]
I've been running this since mid Feb at home. It's been rock solid.
I've only had 1 issue (other than it never remembering default audio devices which I set manually to resolve)
Snaps break all the time for me. I installed VS Code, after reboot I couldn't launch it, had to uninstall/reinstall. Fixed, reboot, broken. Installed it via terminal. 0 issues.
Same with Slack, Chrome, and Skype, and anything else I tried with Snaps.
The nice 2x high-resolution display is generally significantly more expensive (just compare 4k and 5k displays at 27’’), so the advice isn’t wrong, it’s just not very practical.
> just compare 4k and 5k displays at 27’’ I have one of these, a Samsung U28E590D which I'm very happy with in every way. That thing cost me 220 € (purchased in Germany), so I don't see what's particularly expensive about 4K 27" displays at this point unless you have some very particular requirements about shortest possible reaction time or precise color calibration.
The point is 5k 27’’ displays are significantly more expensive than 4k 27’’ ones (which are very affordable). And unless you prefer very large everything, running a 4k 27’’ display at 2x (meaning 1920x1080) is not desirable. But 5k 27’’ displays can be relatively comfortably run at 2x.
Snap packages are the reason I moved from Ubuntu Mate to Fedora Mate. I use free software to own my computer, if it decides on its own when to update like snaps do that defeats the purpose.
Does that distro use flatpacks? I also hate snap with a passion, but I dont think flatpack will be better, what are your thoughts on this?
No, fedora Mate has no flatpaks by default. I do use them on my machine though. They are not as integrated to the system as snaps on Ubuntu but they update only when I tell them to and I like the additional security benefits of the flatpak project overall.
Most reviews are very positive. Faster, better, Amazon removed, maybe the best Ubuntu release until now. The only 'con' is the pushing of Snap packages. It looks like deb files only can be installed via the terminal. Ubuntu is also researching if they can get Adobe on board. I doubt this would ever happen, but that would be huge. Most people stick on Windows and MacOS because Adobe software is not available on Linux.…
Idk, since 10.04 I've appreciated that Ubuntu is as far as a mainstream Linux desktop distro as it gets and just works (I used to run various distros including RH/CentOS, Debian, Suse, Gentoo, and also FreeBSD). But I'm on the brink to leave (maybe towards Void Linux, Debian/Devuan, or back-to-Slackware) because the things I care about have atrophied (lightweight DE, real Unix environment) while crap (snap, systemd, gnome-shell, invasive command-line suggestions) has taken over. On 19.10 gnome-shell really gets in the way for me. And Unix command line utilities I'm using all the time stopped working for me (for example, even vim on Ubuntu 19.04 comes with broken syntax highlighting OOTB, and annoingly and incompetently inserts tabs and spaces where there must be none, something I haven't seen any vi implementation doing for over 30 years; also, awk rejects complex regexpes all of a sudden on 19.04). I know there are other 'buntus shipping with alternatives for gnome-shell but for me the point is/was that there is a large installed base eliminating glitches, which however isn't the case for alternate 'buntus any more than it is for non-'buntus. I also don't see the benefit of yet another packaging format; the point of a desktop distro should be to deliver a consolidated set of shared libs rather than going nuclear and ship everything in fscking containers, especially when there are exactly zero new desktop apps coming out these days (with the exception of Chrome which I'd rather install containerized, and which I only use for website testing, my main browser being FF anyway).
Most reviews are very positive. Faster, better, Amazon removed, maybe the best Ubuntu release until now. The only 'con' is the pushing of Snap packages. It looks like deb files only can be installed via the terminal. Ubuntu is also researching if they can get Adobe on board. I doubt this would ever happen, but that would be huge. Most people stick on Windows and MacOS because Adobe software is not available on Linux.…
I hope the HiDPI support is improved now. Right now, when I use fractional scaling on 19.10, none of the display settings get saved and so after a restart, I have to readjust all of the layout, orientation and scaling for displays. Pretty annoying for a dual-boot triple display system. edit: Nevermind, seems that it got even worse for my case: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/1... https://bu…
Try using mixed DPI displays. My main display is 27 inch 4K display, and on the sides I have old 19 inch 1280x1024 displays, used for IRC, music player, process monitor, email etc. Stuff I glance at from time to time.
_NOTHING_ supports this setup properly. Even Windows has bugs galore as soon as you mix high and low DPI displays. I don't believe anyone ever tests this scenario. I've learned to tolerate and work around the Windows bugs, but I've never gotten it to work at all in any Linux desktop environment I've tried.