41–50 of 84 posts
This is not eye-candy it's minimum s I need to get work done!
This is as low as a bar I can imagine but last time I checked from the mainstream Linux DEs, only a version of KDE/Plasma (can't stand KDE, so was a no-go out of the bat) had this.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Desktop environments on Linux is really the most asinine dick swinging contest I have ever witnessed in my life. Subscribe to /r/unixporn for a single week and you will be absolutely amazed at the shit you will learn.
I hardly believe that anybody would use most of those environments on a daily use.
I hate all these "most beatiful Linux desktop" things. They all suck. Let's look at this pic: https://ubuntudde.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/UbuntuDDE-D... It showcases the desktop of the "most beautiful desktop environment". Either it does not come with a browser installed, or the browser is not added to that launch bar or they changed the browser icon but not the email client icon. As the email client icon highli…
Gnome and KDE are indeed more beautiful.
I wonder why people still feel the need to come up with more DEs instead of contributing to the plenty of existing ones...
I hate all these "most beatiful Linux desktop" things. They all suck. Let's look at this pic: https://ubuntudde.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/UbuntuDDE-D... It showcases the desktop of the "most beautiful desktop environment". Either it does not come with a browser installed, or the browser is not added to that launch bar or they changed the browser icon but not the email client icon. As the email client icon highli…
Well, now that you bring up Ubuntu, I wonder if anyone else out there dislikes its purple & orange color scheme. It might technically be a selection of compatible colors, but to me it's always looked ugly.
...can it do multiple DPIs on multiple displays? This is not eye-candy it's minimum s I need to get work done! This is as low as a bar I can imagine but last time I checked from the mainstream Linux DEs, only a version of KDE/Plasma (can't stand KDE, so was a no-go out of the bat) had this.
I find it baffling that a website who's sole purpose is to present "the most beautiful desktop environment" would present low resolution, reduced color screenshots to back the claim. examples: https://ubuntudde.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/ubuntudde-l... https://ubuntudde.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/ubuntudde-f... There are better screenshots behind the "Digital Assets" nav link, but I wouldn't have found that,…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Desktop environments on Linux is really the most asinine dick swinging contest I have ever witnessed in my life. Subscribe to /r/unixporn for a single week and you will be absolutely amazed at the shit you will learn.
I hardly believe that anybody would use most of those environments on a daily use.
...can it do multiple DPIs on multiple displays? This is not eye-candy it's minimum s I need to get work done! This is as low as a bar I can imagine but last time I checked from the mainstream Linux DEs, only a version of KDE/Plasma (can't stand KDE, so was a no-go out of the bat) had this.
So by imitating macOS look they got "the most beautiful desktop environment".
I don't get it. If I want macOS, I would run the real deal, either by buying a Mac or by doing a hackintosh install.
Earlier there were Linux distros trying to imitate Windows XP. That was bad, too.
I think time wasted and effort would be better spent on inventing something new or refining some ideas striving to do something better, trying to solve problems.
I don't get the problem this desktop environment solves. Are they catering to people who love Macs but don't want to use Macs? That's a rather tiny population.
Or maybe the problem they tried to solve was Linux having too few desktop environments.