Live data from Hacker News

Why we listen to new music

pitchfork.com

31–40 of 166 posts

Re: Why we listen to new music

#31

Does anyone else grow "numb" to a track after listening to it for a while? 400-500 plays seems to be the limit for me, and the period between plays doesn't seem to matter, after which it evokes no pleasing feelings, and even causes a little annoyance as if some part in the brain is "sore" from it.

Hedonic treadmill.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hedonic_treadmill

Re: Why we listen to new music

#32
post #12

I can no longer enjoy the music the way I did as a teenager. I automatically picked up the lyrics, I still remember them to this day. I sought new music, new bands. There was a peak when I was around 18-19 and after that I listened to music less and less. Similar thing happened with movies. I followed sites like pitchfork but today I'm just not interested. I started noticing that music on my hard drive would get bigg…

Funny I'm the same way I think. I used to be so into music, I was always listening to something. I had a massive collection of pirated music lol. Always looking for something new to check out. When edm and dubstep blew up I was always out at shows, festivals, random dj nights. Tried writing a lot of my own music, even had small release Then idk I got my first job out of college around 24 and stopped searching or even…

I'm sure if you speak to an 18 y/o today they'll tell you there is a scene. But give them 10 years and they'll be saying the same as you.

I think it's just how our brains change. When we're in our late teens, striking out into the world everything is new and full of possibilities. We hoover up new experiences and crave novelty as we find our place in the world. But later on in life that's no longer necessary - we enter stable survival mode instead.

I think evolutionary biology can explain a lot of this (the same happened to me too btw).

Re: Why we listen to new music

#33

Does anyone else grow "numb" to a track after listening to it for a while? 400-500 plays seems to be the limit for me, and the period between plays doesn't seem to matter, after which it evokes no pleasing feelings, and even causes a little annoyance as if some part in the brain is "sore" from it.

Try putting that track into your random-shuffle collection; you might get some more miles out of it that way. That's what I do for my housework music: whether it's in a pocket mp3 player or 'mpg123 -C -Z *mp3', it's all familiar tracks that roughly fit the mood, and the familiarity of the tune is there but there's just enough surprise from its being up next to make it pleasant without being distracting.

Re: Why we listen to new music

#34

Listening to new music is one of my favourite activities. Don't understand how people are happy to listen to the same old stuff - it must get so dull. There's so much good stuff out there, and it's so exciting to find an artist, genre or new combinations of sounds I've not heard before. Bandcamp is great for this – better than Spotify or Apple Music. You can explore by artist, genre tag, label, and by people who have…

A lot of great music is in the back catalogue.Google music has a good catalogue for example include possibly all of the curated Grateful Dead recordings like the Dave's Picks, and Dick's Picks. Enough content for a lifetime. To find new music rather than seek out new artists, a more promising avenue might be to look into the past, there so much of great work which has fallen into obscurity.

Re: Why we listen to new music

#35

I use Spotify Discover Weekly. In the 30 recommendations, there usually is one I like. Than I check out the Album and artist and with a bit of luck I have hours of new music to listen to.

Discover Weekly is pretty great, although it tends to have a lot of covers of songs that it knows I already like. Turns out way more people have covered The Beatles than I ever would have guessed. Sometimes I'll click through to the artist page if I really like their voices, but for the most part I just skip to the next song in the list.

Re: Why we listen to new music

#36

"The Rite" may have been technically groundbreaking, but it sounds TERRIBLE. We've seen plenty of artistic experimentation over the centuries leading to new artistic genres, but early experiments like these are almost always awful. It takes someone with skill in aesthetics to turn the new into the beautiful, and it's rarely the inventor who does this.

It works better if you think of it as a soundtrack/score to a movie. There's lots of stuff going on that you're missing by just listening to it without the visuals.

Re: Why we listen to new music

#37
post #28
post #24

Art (and music) is not something for endless consumption. Music is something we tie to our experiences, to our life, to times we've known, etc. There's no real need to always seek new music, obsessively, unless you particularly enjoy to (or you have business reasons). You're not a bad person, or more shallow, or lesser art lover, for not doing so (in fact many very deep creators of art had a very limited set of artis…

You could easily same the same for movies, TV shows, games, cuisine, parks, or anything. If you like something, there's nothing wrong with enjoying it again. It doesn't mean you should limit yourself to the things you know. Once in a while you find something that's better than anything you've encountered before.

>Once in a while you find something that's better than anything you've encountered before.

Yeah, you can find something new you like, but that doesn't mean that you necessarily have to be looking for it, especially not obsessively.

Re: Why we listen to new music

#38

I use the Music-Map for my "music journey". Every other day, I start from an artist I already like and travel through the names until I stumble into an area I have not been to before: https://www.music-map.com

That's very cool, I've been thinking about making a similar thing to discover new music but for a few bands I checked this does both provide bands I know to be similar as well as bands that I don't know. This seems to be powered by http://www.gnoosic.com/ , is this the only source of data?

I'm guessing that The Mars Volta may be one of your pet loves. I worked this out via ... ESP

;)

Re: Why we listen to new music

#39
I remember stumbling upon a hypothesis when I was studying musicology that suggest that music is appealing to us because is has to do with our most primitive senses when in our mother's womb, both for rhythm (heart beat) and melody (mother's voice). We then build on top of that.

Re: Why we listen to new music

#40

I use the Music-Map for my "music journey". Every other day, I start from an artist I already like and travel through the names until I stumble into an area I have not been to before: https://www.music-map.com

Will check out music map, ty.

HypeMachine tracks the music being written about across thousands of blogs and still works for me as a great discovery / serendipity engine.

https://hypem.com/

Tracks link to artists on Bandcamp, SoundCloud, Spotify, the write-up that got them picked up by HypeM, and any work from the artist previously covered.

I usually listen by genre and pick those per the kind of work I’m doing. There are many genres. 98% of what I hear is new to me. I favorite and skip tracks and open especially tasty ones in new tabs for deeper-dives.

It’s always a pleasure to go back to my feed of favorites every few weeks. I revisit tracks i took time to explicitly like and have long uninterrupted sets to enjoy. This is usually when I do deeper dives and buy stuff on SoundCloud and Bandcamp.

Post reply on HN