Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Does it need to? If a language interest a community, then it's reason enough to learn it. I've nothing against people voluntarily choosing to learn a language. But most language learning is done by children who are heavily pressured if not outright forced into it by their parents (who usually, hypocritically, do not put the same time into language learning themselves). That's cruel in my book.
I think it is cruel that their language was taken away from them, but I find it inspiring they are trying to rebuild their linguistics community. Not every child will like what they are taught, but if they can create an environment where the language is used, the kids are likely to follow. I hardly see how that is cruel.
A Bemidji professor is on a quest to keep the Ojibwe language alive
31–35 of 35 posts
Re: A Bemidji professor is on a quest to keep the Ojibwe language alive
#32I'm struck by how many of them have seemingly ethnic-Japanese facial features.
Not just Japanese, but East (and North) Asian in general. In fact, because of the genetic similarities, and of course lack of samples, a lot of DNA profiling lumps Indigenous Americans and East Asians in one group. I have Native American ancestry, and was doing research on our history and was shocked to see the grouping, but also not so shocked, as it makes sense.
But of course it's likely that the ancestors of the other Native American groupings did come from Asia, via the Bering Strait, which at various times was above water--there are just no plausible connections between these languages and languages of Asia, which is not surprising given the time depth.
Re: A Bemidji professor is on a quest to keep the Ojibwe language alive
#33Is there any evidence of this common claim that obscure languages "may contain some of the most critical solutions to the problems we face as humans"? What kind of problems is he talking about there? Has it ever happened before? So what that a monkey is a "lice hunter"? In English, an anteater is an anteater and a wood splitter is a wood splitter. It's not a very special way of naming things. Maybe this language has…
>Yes, and English does that job much better because you can actually communicate with the world and multiple generations. That's a misunderstanding of Treuer's point. English is able to define English nations and express the English cultural perspective. He's not arguing that language, generally, is a tool for communication - he's saying that specific languages each yield their own specific identities. To address the…
Re: A Bemidji professor is on a quest to keep the Ojibwe language alive
#34Is there any evidence of this common claim that obscure languages "may contain some of the most critical solutions to the problems we face as humans"? What kind of problems is he talking about there? Has it ever happened before? So what that a monkey is a "lice hunter"? In English, an anteater is an anteater and a wood splitter is a wood splitter. It's not a very special way of naming things. Maybe this language has…
I'm with you, and frankly the other replies sort of prove your point. No one has given any example of what you asked for and everyone seems to think learning a language like that is easy and simple and won't displace more important activities...
Re: A Bemidji professor is on a quest to keep the Ojibwe language alive
#35get their symbols into unicode, and have someone write up how the language works phonetically so we don't lose anything historic.
why does someone speaking it matter?