Live data from Hacker News

Oil plunges below zero for first time with May contract ending

bloomberg.com

361–370 of 546 posts

Re: Oil plunges below zero for first time with May contract ending

#361

Why wasn't the oils producers reducing their production fast enough to prevent the price from crashing. This to me looks like a lag and inelasticity in how the oil producers are responding to demand.

It's a good question, but a number of producers are trying to put others out of business. I don't know that this was necessary considering the drop off in consumption, but perhaps the point is to generate a supply shock in order to make a bigger point.

Re: Oil plunges below zero for first time with May contract ending

#362
post #347

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I've never been to Cushing Oklahoma. I feel like it should be possible to build a big tank in a week or two. Why isn't available storage space skyrocketing?

There is a little bit more to an oil tank than just steel walls. You need proper foundations, fire prevention systems, disaster plans, probably get hooked up to the pipeline network, etc etc etc. Even if it were quick, the amount of oil being pumped up is massive and you need more than a few tanks to store it all. Finally, tanks are long term infrastructure and it might not be profitable to build out storage too much…

Yeah, it's worth building these tanks safely. There was tank fire last year in Bay Area after a quake: https://www.youtube.com/watch?reload=9&v=KMZjfWRXgTs Even if there is different level of risk and safety concern, and air quality regulation in rural Oklahoma vs urban CA bordering a highway, these can catch fire dramatically.

One point made when that fire occurred was that the tanks are placed in earthen basins, so that when tank fails, the flaming fuel just fills the basin, minimizing risk of spreading to neighboring tanks.

Re: Oil plunges below zero for first time with May contract ending

#363
post #281

Earlier quoted context omitted.

By definition all open futures contracts have to either a) be Physically delivered Or b) be closed (remember that for futures contracts there is someone on each side (prepared to deliver 1,000 bbl and prepared to receive 1,000 bbl) Now if you are a financial participant you need to close out your position as you are not in a position to either deliver/receive physical oil - so you need to essentially pay whatever it…

This isn't true for all contracts. For example, gold contracts are/can be settled for cash. I remember during the Great Recession talks about gold conspiracies and that gold futures contracts can be forced settled in cash instead of physical delivery. I'm not sure if that's true or if that's part of the futures contract, though.

The context here is oil - the benchmark contract and the one referenced in the article is the NYMEX CL (WTI/Cushing) it’s a deliverable contract.

https://www.cmegroup.com/trading/energy/crude-oil/light-swee...

Re: Oil plunges below zero for first time with May contract ending

#364

If the pandemic lasts longer than 6 months, which is quite likely, many high-cost oil producers might not survive. Some would argue this could lead to shortage and a much higher price later on, but long-term oil demand could also be affected. There might be some semi-permanent change in people's behaviors if the epidemic continues for many months. Many people will form a habit of doing more things at home/online: mor…

This was at least originally about a strange oils price war between Saudi and Russia. It just happened to coincide with the pandemic. Though I'd guess by now the pandemic adds fuel to the non-fire.

Not really , Chinese demand had dropped sharply in late January due civoid shutdowns . The original production cut discussions were influenced by that significantly.

Saudi/Russia likely did not anticipate a global lockdown and decided to get into a price war to keep their absolute revenue numbers stable albeit by increasing production under reduced prices ,that has of course backfired spectacularly.

Re: Oil plunges below zero for first time with May contract ending

#365
post #351

Note that this is for the May contract, which closes tomorrow, and anyone left with a contract then will have to actually take delivery of the physical product. Since we are in supercontango (oil storage is full, causing spot prices to be significantly lower than forward prices), I am guessing that traders who are still holding on to contracts and don’t have available storage have to unload contracts pretty quickly.…

The May contract was still selling at $22 as of last Tuesday. I don't know much about oil markets but my base assumption would be that we would do this whole thing over again in 30 days unless something significant happens in consumption or production? When do the output cuts begin?

And can I somehow short these contracts a week before the next deadline?

Re: Oil plunges below zero for first time with May contract ending

#366

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Sorry to miss it, but how does this answer my question? I asked why they weren't prepared on Friday. Storage has been expensive and getting more expensive for weeks. We've been in a massive contango for weeks. Why weren't they prepared on Friday for physical delivery?

It's only a paper loss until you sell. Everybody was hoping and praying things would change and now that it's abundantly clear that it's not changing, they're desperately trying to unwind their positions.

Futures contracts are daily settled. So the difference between starting price and ending price has to be paid at end-of-day settlement.

Re: Oil plunges below zero for first time with May contract ending

#367

“ The upcoming May contract’s expiry means traders are shifting their positions to June as they try to avoid taking deliveries of cargoes because of the lack of space to store them. That has opened up an unprecedented discount of more than $10 between the two nearest contracts. This situation—in which the price of the June contract is far above that of the May one—apparently delights in the name “super contango.” Peo…

Non-mobile link: https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2020-04-20/there-...

Re: Oil plunges below zero for first time with May contract ending

#368
post #270

[edited for typos/grammar] The US was going to top up the strategic reserves, but that was stopped in congress. Seems like an ideal time to make that happen with such low prices. Irregardless of environmental concerns, nobody is at a point where they are not dependent on oil and a supply disruption that this is designed to address currently would have dire consequences without it. IE: food shortages etc..

There is no reason for the US government to pay to take oil out of the ground to put it into the ground elsewhere. Fracking has made the US an oil exporter. As others mentioned, fracking has made the US the world's lowest cost producer.

If top US leadership was less demented, they could secretly "buy" up all of these $-35 May contracts and get paid 35 dollars a barrel to put it in the strategic reserve.

But if such an agreement had been made in Congress and the US was obligated to buy at a certain (positive) price, you can bet the price wouldn't be $-35 right now.

Re: Oil plunges below zero for first time with May contract ending

#369
post #312

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think it briefly went negative! Let's add that to the list "Things I never thought I'd see but 2020 happened"

Not briefly, it’s still negative and hit -$40.

I think one of you are talking futures and the other physical oil. The prices are very disconnected at the moment.

Re: Oil plunges below zero for first time with May contract ending

#370
post #171

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You'll also see the economy in the fourth largest city in the US - Houston - collapse. It's not just the large energy companies here, but the entire ecosystem of companies that support the energy industry here.

Are there any signs of this starting to happen given how low prices have gone?

One of the popular indicators is number of listings and prices for F-250 class and bigger trucks, especially in places like West Texas and North Dakota.

Of course the automotive market in general is "non-typical" at the moment, so there are probably multiple interpretations to be made of whatever the market status is.

Post reply on HN