Earlier quoted context omitted.
I would NEVER put calculus into required curriculum. Calculus is far less important than some simple number theory, logic, and the ability to think about abstract problems creatively. The tragedy is that we push towards calculus (which is really just advanced arithmetic until you get to, say college, real analysis) at the expense of these other skills.
While agreeing with the sister-child I'll also say that yes, other math and thinking skills are also important, but there's no reason we can't have those and calculus too. Throw out some of the more useless things like PE, get rid of certain requirements like art, maybe take away a year or two of the "read books most of the class doesn't care about and write essays hurriedly read over by the prof to later be never re…
Hardest captcha ever?
111–120 of 125 posts
Re: Hardest captcha ever?
#112You can just pass the equation in Wolfram Alpha directly and you have your answer! The font is crystal clear and the equation is quite simple.
Re: Hardest captcha ever?
#113Earlier quoted context omitted.
My mom and I used to take turns reading the code listings from magazines like Compute! and RUN to each other and typing them in. It took forever. I definitely find it harder to do that with punctuation heavy languages these days (not that I'm typing much code in from magazines anymore).
Oh, god I remember doing that for the TRS-80 (was it assembly? that's what I remember.) You'd spend hours typing in codes from a magazine, and I think my Dad and I had about a 5% success rate actually getting the program to run at the end.
My mom likes to say "I was just having fun, typing in the games and playing them, but you were actually learning something."
Re: Hardest captcha ever?
#114-- Marvin the Paranoid Android (with liberties taken)
Re: Hardest captcha ever?
#115Earlier quoted context omitted.
(Was it Sam H.?) When I was at MIT I had a lab partner who was blind for I think 6.002 or 6.003. I remember that one side-effect of using a screen reader was that he easily "recited" code, which I don't think most sighted programmers could do fluently. Of course, in order to understand what he was reciting, my only hope was generally to try to type it into a text editor, format it and look at it. (And it's also hard…
My mom and I used to take turns reading the code listings from magazines like Compute! and RUN to each other and typing them in. It took forever. I definitely find it harder to do that with punctuation heavy languages these days (not that I'm typing much code in from magazines anymore).
Re: Hardest captcha ever?
#116Earlier quoted context omitted.
Oh, god I remember doing that for the TRS-80 (was it assembly? that's what I remember.) You'd spend hours typing in codes from a magazine, and I think my Dad and I had about a 5% success rate actually getting the program to run at the end.
Run often had BASIC programs that built machine language routines from DATA statements, just a series of numbers. At one point they changed the program so that one of the bytes in each DATA statement was a checksum, and it would tell you if the rest of the line was accurate or not. That helped a lot. My mom likes to say "I was just having fun, typing in the games and playing them, but you were actually learning somet…
Re: Hardest captcha ever?
#117Most of these are really easy. I got a partial derivative of a constant. And honestly, if you can't answer basic math questions, you probably have no use for a quantum random bit generator.
I got "find the least real zero of the polynomial: -7 * 4 - 7". Somehow I doubt "mu" would be accepted. (That sort of think has only shown up once over multiple refreshes though.)
Re: Hardest captcha ever?
#118Re: Hardest captcha ever?
#119This brings to mind a recent article about solving the "hacker news problem". It occurs to me that requiring an entrance exam of some sort could weed out users unprepared to constructively contribute to any domain specific online forum.
Re: Hardest captcha ever?
#120Dumbest CAPTCHA ever. It's a math problem - which computers are great at - in highly readable text; which they're pretty good at. I expect someone talented could break it in an automated fashion in a day or less. I don't know why they don't just throw up an fairly large image of a bunch of animals, then say "Click the cutest kitten" or something that's purely subjective, and relies on human recognition abilities rath…
Hmmm, perhaps this is the first of many in a dystopian future of human CAPTCHAs... "Please solve this equation in 200ms or less. Sorry, no humans allowed."
Spambots try to spew spam as quickly as possible, right? I wonder how effective it would be to flag those who fill out the signup forms too quickly as likely spammers and check up on them or impose extra limitations until they had been using their account for a while without spamming?