Live data from Hacker News

The irony of Apple homepage and Safari WebP support

mobilerank.co

41–50 of 75 posts

Re: The irony of Apple homepage and Safari WebP support

#41

Could anyone one please tell me what is the purpose of the Web Notifications, other than invasive marketing.

- Calendar event notifications

- Instant messaging notifications (e.g. Riot.im, Glowing Bear, WhatsApp, Discord, Slack)

- Changes to files in cloud/collaboration services

Basically, any time you would use a push notification on a mobile device, but when the "desktop application" is essentially just an electron wrapper of the web UI.

Re: The irony of Apple homepage and Safari WebP support

#42

Could anyone one please tell me what is the purpose of the Web Notifications, other than invasive marketing.

They're useful on desktop, for having things like Gmail open in the background, but they're not hugely useful on mobile. Usually if you want notifications you would already have the app installed.

Re: The irony of Apple homepage and Safari WebP support

#45

Could anyone one please tell me what is the purpose of the Web Notifications, other than invasive marketing.

It's one of the few remaining features needed to create fully functional web applications, on par with the functionality of a native app.

As an example, I refuse to install a native Facebook application because of privacy concerns, but a web version with push notification support could provide the same functionality.

Re: The irony of Apple homepage and Safari WebP support

#46

> The irony comes from the fact that Apple decided not to add WebP support to the Safari browser I don't get it. Why is this ironic? Did Apple create the performance optimisation tool that suggested WebP?

It’s ironic because it’s apple.com that of all sites would benefit from Apple supporting WebP. (according to the author, not me)

Re: The irony of Apple homepage and Safari WebP support

#47
1. Apple's users won't care. The ones who know about "WebP" will explain it away by claiming "Apple rejected it because it doesn't meet their high quality standards. The page looks more beautiful this way; WebP will drain the battery; WebP isn't secure; etc."

2. I'm pretty sure this isn't "irony." https://www.dictionary.com/browse/irony?s=t

Re: The irony of Apple homepage and Safari WebP support

#48

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That's pretty fringey. Given that Apple devices still use the web a lot, including inside apps.

Easily explained! Apple prefers you to use native widgets to make your app harder to port.

That argument could be used for Qt, GNOME, macOS, or Windows. And besides, React Native is a thing.

Re: The irony of Apple homepage and Safari WebP support

#49
post #42

Could anyone one please tell me what is the purpose of the Web Notifications, other than invasive marketing.

They're useful on desktop, for having things like Gmail open in the background, but they're not hugely useful on mobile. Usually if you want notifications you would already have the app installed.

The whole point is that if Apple would allow this, you wouldn't have to install the app. You could just use the website.

Forums are an example where the website is perfectly fine without an app, but I'd really like to be able to choose whether or not I get push notifications from them on my phone.

Post reply on HN