How the Anti-Vaccine Community Is Responding to Covid-19
1–10 of 111 posts
Re: How the Anti-Vaccine Community Is Responding to Covid-19
#2Re: How the Anti-Vaccine Community Is Responding to Covid-19
#3For those who don't know, there is a camp of people who believe that we're getting vaccinations at way too fast a schedule. Yes, this includes doctors, like the aforementioned pediatrician.
Re: How the Anti-Vaccine Community Is Responding to Covid-19
#4Re: How the Anti-Vaccine Community Is Responding to Covid-19
#5This planet will always have people who are always not happy with something. And don't get me wrong it positive. Even stupid alarming vaccine campaigns caused better results evaluation. And since this is a liberal society where you can't force people to stay at home even if it will cause death, oh well... this is the only way, someone should die without vaccine first.
What does this mean? It doesn't make sense in English, so could you please elaborate?
> someone should die without vaccine
This is a fundamental misunderstanding of why anti-vaxxers are a problem.
They don't just kill themselves. They break herd immunity and put other people at risk. They have already caused outbreaks that have killed adults and children who did get their vaccines.
Re: How the Anti-Vaccine Community Is Responding to Covid-19
#6I can't say as conflating antivaxxers with a pediatrician that recommends a delayed/modified vaccine schedule is exactly productive. Delayed/modified schedule isn't to blame for measles. Pretty disingenuous, IMO. For those who don't know, there is a camp of people who believe that we're getting vaccinations at way too fast a schedule. Yes, this includes doctors, like the aforementioned pediatrician.
Re: How the Anti-Vaccine Community Is Responding to Covid-19
#7It's no different than forcing a man to join the Military if he doesn't want to join, or forcing the man NOT to join the Military, if he does want to join.
A future Constitution will explicitly support the right to be medicated/vaccinated if one wishes to be, while conversely supporting the right NOT to be medicated/vaccinated, if one does not.
Our current Constitution supports these rights, implicitly, via the 9th Amendment:
"The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people."
(Although, in an increasingly legislative and legalistic society, those rights may have to be asserted, asserted repeatedly, asserted to multiple people who are not aware of them, and asserted hard...)
Re: How the Anti-Vaccine Community Is Responding to Covid-19
#8I can't say as conflating antivaxxers with a pediatrician that recommends a delayed/modified vaccine schedule is exactly productive. Delayed/modified schedule isn't to blame for measles. Pretty disingenuous, IMO. For those who don't know, there is a camp of people who believe that we're getting vaccinations at way too fast a schedule. Yes, this includes doctors, like the aforementioned pediatrician.
> For those who don't know, there is a camp of people who believe that we're getting vaccinations at way too fast a schedule. Yes, this includes doctors, like the aforementioned pediatrician.
It is not only "anti-liberal" to shout people down, but it is anti-science to ignore claims on findings and this is how I find the "anti-vaxxer" term to be used.
I can't find the article right now, but I strongly encourage people to be more cautious about throwing the stupid terms around as some people are rather more nuanced.
I am not defending the following claim, but among other claims is one that states a popularly cited measles outbreak occurred with 95% of the people catching having been immunized. The claim is that the immunizations are no longer effective. Again, I am not trying to support the claim, but simply labeling "anti-vaxxer" is not the way to address such claims and will attract an audience who will have no way to counter such claims because all opposition is engaged in schoolyard name-calling activities.
EDIT:
It is astounding to me that the commenters of, at least this article, are unable to distinguish my claim from claims of people discussed in the article.
Re: How the Anti-Vaccine Community Is Responding to Covid-19
#9This planet will always have people who are always not happy with something. And don't get me wrong it positive. Even stupid alarming vaccine campaigns caused better results evaluation. And since this is a liberal society where you can't force people to stay at home even if it will cause death, oh well... this is the only way, someone should die without vaccine first.
herd immunity is a big deal for many different reasons
- it stops the spread
- it protects the immunocompromised
- it protects newborns and those too young/old to get vaccinations
Re: How the Anti-Vaccine Community Is Responding to Covid-19
#10I can't say as conflating antivaxxers with a pediatrician that recommends a delayed/modified vaccine schedule is exactly productive. Delayed/modified schedule isn't to blame for measles. Pretty disingenuous, IMO. For those who don't know, there is a camp of people who believe that we're getting vaccinations at way too fast a schedule. Yes, this includes doctors, like the aforementioned pediatrician.
Keyword here being believe. Their opinion is based on purely belief without any proof. All it does is give the kids their immunity later giving the pathogen a window to get them sick and spread the pathogen further