If B follows from A via logic, but A is invented, isn't B invented as well then? Just to take a recent example which was mentioned here, Geometric Algebra[1]. There you assume you have some objects which aren't numbers but which when squared equals a given number. By doing that a bunch of nice results have been discovered. However to me the basic premise, take some objects which aren't numbers but which square to a n…
It sounds to me like you are giving special precedence to "numbers" in your considerations, as well as drawing your intuition for "square" from working with the integers or the reals. A square is just the result of a binary (product) operation where both of the operands are equal. The operation can be defined on an algebraic object with much richer structure than the integers or reals, and the operation itself can be…
At least if there is to be any meaningful distinction between a discovery and an invention.