The hardest captcha I've come across is the audio one used by Google on https://www.google.com/accounts/NewAccount . Click the little wheelchair icon to hear it. It's so hard to decipher, it almost comes across as a cruel joke at the expense of blind people. These are much easier, in that I can actually understand them.
Once at MIT a blind student was showing me his screen reader. I couldn't make sense of the sounds at all, and asked if it was in some special code. He said no, it was normal language, just really fast. He had it read the current line on his terminal (this was late '80s). I could see the words it was supposedly reading, but I still couldn't map them to the brief burst of sound that came from the screen reader. So mayb…
Hardest captcha ever?
81–90 of 125 posts
Re: Hardest captcha ever?
#82A subsequent reload sent it back to a more complex formula.
Re: Hardest captcha ever?
#83Re: Hardest captcha ever?
#84Re: Hardest captcha ever?
#85The real WTF with this captcha is that to get a new one they recommend you reload the page, which will clear out everything you just typed into the form (since you probably typed that all before getting to the captcha), which is retarded. If you try to be smart and just put in a known wrong answer in hopes that it'll keep the form data and give you a new question, you get dumped to a validation page which tells you y…
Re: Hardest captcha ever?
#86The hardest captcha I've come across is the audio one used by Google on https://www.google.com/accounts/NewAccount . Click the little wheelchair icon to hear it. It's so hard to decipher, it almost comes across as a cruel joke at the expense of blind people. These are much easier, in that I can actually understand them.
Re: Hardest captcha ever?
#87Earlier quoted context omitted.
The point of most captchas is to stop someone from writing a program that abuses your system. If you're not doing that, what exactly are you "verifying"?
I want to make sure a person votes only once. But if they want to game the system fine as long as they are willing to submit a captcha For another website, I used to store the IP address and do checks but for a simple system that seem to be overkill. All of the websites have no user accounts. Is there another way to do this? Where you want some voting to happen but with no user accounts. And you want it to be dirt si…
If you start with the assumption that no one will try to attack your site, then you don't need a captcha at all. You can give the user any annoying/time-consuming task (e.g. "click a square ten times"), or you can insert an inconvenient delay in vote submission. However, people may object less to the inconvenience of something that looks like a captcha, because they are used to them.
Needless to say, almost no one uses captchas for this purpose. Instead, they use captchas to make their sites more resistant to automated abuse -- as you almost certainly will need if your sites become popular.
Re: Hardest captcha ever?
#88Earlier quoted context omitted.
Aristotle is very very disappointed with your logic, my friend. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inference#Examples_of_deductive...
I think you've misunderstood his post (or I've misunderstood yours (my friend))). He was saying that the linked website was illogical in using a method to distinguish humans from machines, that most humans would fail at. Grandparent wasn't attempting to construct his own logical argument.
Re: Hardest captcha ever?
#89Am I the only one saddened by the fact that this would have been a piece of cake back in high school/college, but can't remember how to do them (integrals) anymore? :(
Re: Hardest captcha ever?
#90The hardest captcha I've come across is the audio one used by Google on https://www.google.com/accounts/NewAccount . Click the little wheelchair icon to hear it. It's so hard to decipher, it almost comes across as a cruel joke at the expense of blind people. These are much easier, in that I can actually understand them.
Once at MIT a blind student was showing me his screen reader. I couldn't make sense of the sounds at all, and asked if it was in some special code. He said no, it was normal language, just really fast. He had it read the current line on his terminal (this was late '80s). I could see the words it was supposedly reading, but I still couldn't map them to the brief burst of sound that came from the screen reader. So mayb…
What I mean is, has somebody any insight if it would be worth it, from a productivity point of view, to use those tools for non-blind people?