Live data from Hacker News

Bouncing DVD Logo

bouncingdvdlogo.com

151–160 of 293 posts

Re: Bouncing DVD Logo

#151

Earlier quoted context omitted.

And broadband adoption. I think streaming actually killed it, not a higher resolution format.

Doesn't Blu-ray still have better quality than most streaming services?

It does. I’m sure most people don’t think the quality difference is worth the hassle of storing physical discs and paying for them. Compressed 1080 is good enough.

Re: Bouncing DVD Logo

#153

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It didn't even occur to me that this would need to be explained. Up next we should talk about why it was bad to leave VCRs paused for long periods of time.

Some kids call 3.5" floppies "save icons" because they've never seen them in any other context

That’s what I call them and I was born in 89...

Re: Bouncing DVD Logo

#154

In 1999, my DVD player could do this smoothly without any hitches or glitches. In 2020, my Xeon can't render this fast enough to avoid stutters. Either code quality has gone way down or my DVD player had a faster CPU.

Interesting. Could you show me a Chromium implementation for your 1999 DVD? Since we're comparing apples to oranges here, it shouldn't be a problem.

Re: Bouncing DVD Logo

#155

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Those Sony Trinitron's were literally were made of lead. My back still hurts, but the 20" was worth it!

And 120hz refresh rates... almost 20 years ago!

I never noticed a benefit over 70 or so. The flicker of 60 made my eyes bleed though. Then with LCDs 60 was fine.

Re: Bouncing DVD Logo

#156
post #130

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I remember being told as a child that it "wears out the tape," but I'm going to guess it's specifically because the same section of tape stays wrapped around the capstan (the metal cylinder it loops around to be read) when it would normally be passing through. Keeping the same section of tape under tension for a prolonged period presumably weakens or risks distorting it.

So kinda like riding a clutch... ok maybe not that bad.

More like a burnout vs launch control, with infinite tread and it's the road you really care about.

Re: Bouncing DVD Logo

#157

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think my favorite contextual example of this is the opening line from Neuromancer: "The sky above the port was the colour of television, tuned to a dead channel." Means something very different now.

I guess that means perfect blue skies these days haha

Neil Gaiman made a joke about this in 1996 in the novel Neverwhere. Search for "dead channel at http://journal.neilgaiman.com/2004/12/some-days-bears-on-top...

Re: Bouncing DVD Logo

#158
post #9

A while ago I made a bouncing DVD logo that would actually hit the corner every few bounces with high probability: https://nikital.github.io/screensaver (But then it would troll you just before hitting it)

Earlier I commented about turning it into a mac screensaver. Well, I went ahead and did it.

Used your code, but didnt have a license. Do I have your permission? Here is the link to the repo: https://github.com/pabloriveracelerity/mac-dvd-screensaver

Please let me know if you do not approve and I will take it down ASAP. No ill intentions. Just wanted to join the fun. :)

Re: Bouncing DVD Logo

#159

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Doesn't Blu-ray still have better quality than most streaming services?

It does. I’m sure most people don’t think the quality difference is worth the hassle of storing physical discs and paying for them. Compressed 1080 is good enough.

A decent number of streaming services have very good 4K and all you need is a Chromecast Ultra with a $200 TV to make it all work.

Re: Bouncing DVD Logo

#160
post #146

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I had heard of this before, but didn't know that screensavers were designed to prevent that damage from happening. In this case, the bouncing DVD logo seems like an odd choice, as the way it's designed, there are certain pixels on the screen that it will never cross (corners, for example), which would fail to serve the desired purpose. Can someone explain?

Those pixels are off.

To expand on this: off is perfect, off most of the time is wonderful, on and changing is great, on and unchanging is bad. So yes, you ideally want equal usage all around but you're splitting hairs between perfect and wonderful with the bouncing DVD logo's coverage.
Post reply on HN