In other words, will the C standard be effectively “done” at some time in the future?
Tell HN: C Experts Panel – Ask us anything about C
21–30 of 978 posts
Re: Tell HN: C Experts Panel – Ask us anything about C
#22Re: Tell HN: C Experts Panel – Ask us anything about C
#23Re: Tell HN: C Experts Panel – Ask us anything about C
#242. Why it is harder to find lgpl licenced libraries to access windows directories over network like jcifs pysmb (and libraries overall) when needed to close most part of software source to sell small softwares to businesses?
3. If you needed to combo C with another language to do everything you need to do forever and never look back what other language would that be?
Re: Tell HN: C Experts Panel – Ask us anything about C
#25How and why will C combat Rust?
Re: Tell HN: C Experts Panel – Ask us anything about C
#26Re: Tell HN: C Experts Panel – Ask us anything about C
#27Re: Tell HN: C Experts Panel – Ask us anything about C
#28Re: Tell HN: C Experts Panel – Ask us anything about C
#29Are any concurrency primitives planned for introduction in future C revisions?
One goal is to re-unify C with the concurrency object model used by C++ to make std::atomic and _Atomic(T) be ABI compatible as intended in C11. Some small fixes in this area are the removal of ATOMIC_VAR_INIT, clarifying whether library functions can use thread_local storage for internal state, and things along those lines. However, we expect there to be more efforts in this area as we progress the standard.
Re: Tell HN: C Experts Panel – Ask us anything about C
#30C11 has seen new features, such as Generic Selection. Is the current language standardization converging (just adding clarifications, removing the surface for undefined behavior, etc.) or is C still growing with new features? In other words, will the C standard be effectively “done” at some time in the future?