Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Agreed! Clearly you mean UNIX/Linux is the sane one, right? Before you fly into a hissy fit and say the UNIX toolkit theory is insane please learn, read, and respect a little history. So all the famous papers, IEEE, ACM, written by folks like DMR and Thompson are "bogus" arguments, right??? Seems you are going into the hissy fit. I also don't care about your arguments from authority. Programming against a well defi…
You love the word Pavlovian don't you? I'm not making an argument to authority. I'm saying you are dismissing, without any valid argument at all, years of reasoned academics and experienced and careful engineering. So what's your argument? You're level abstract is "better" because it just clearly is. And you're tired of hearing another viewpoint? I think you are very naive and I don't see you how will gain experience…
Maybe you are dense. I have heard all these talking points before, many, many, many times. I do not find them convincing. If you regurgitate copy-pasta from 4chan's /g board I am not going to be interested.
> I think you are very naive and I don't see you how will gain experience if you don't wish to listen to anything you don't already understand!
I've been mucking about with computers since the BBC Micro-computer. I have been developing professionally for 15 years. Don't patronise me. I am actually very very cynical.