Live data from Hacker News

The Gaiman Principle: piracy is advertising & why Ramen Music encourages sharing

blog.ramenmusic.com

11–17 of 17 posts

Re: The Gaiman Principle: piracy is advertising & why Ramen Music encourages sharing

#11
post #2

I read American Gods for the first time after downloading it, and then I bought it.

Slightly OT, but if you liked American Gods, might I also suggest "Good Omens", a book he wrote with Terry Pratchett. Easily one of the funniest books I've read, and a brilliant storyline.

[Coincidentally, I read a downloaded version of this, and have since bought about 10 copies and gifted to people.]

Re: The Gaiman Principle: piracy is advertising & why Ramen Music encourages sharing

#13
post #3

The documentary "Good Copy, Bad Copy" (a must-watch, by the way) has a segment on the Brazilian phenomenon called "Tecno Brega". You can watch it here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xo2sv3jjJi8 Basically, the musicians give out free CDs of their music, and make money on live concerts. They treat the free music as advertising. This is true, if you look at it: the experience of listening to a live music concert is tot…

I don't like what's happening with IP -- meaning the draconian "enforcement" including especially ever-expanding ownership timeframes. But when I see this argument, I can't help thinking, "Not everyone is an extrovert." I think that goes for both listeners (viewers, etc.) and musicians. I'm not trying to make a big counter-argument. Just this point.

I see your argument and think it's important. However, I think it's probably also true that the existing and historical models for rewarding musical talent exclude some people. The question then becomes, which models are better overall and less exclusive.

On the whole I'm not convinced that there is much value in retaining the horribly exploitive traditional model of the mega-powerful recording studio.

Re: The Gaiman Principle: piracy is advertising & why Ramen Music encourages sharing

#14
"No big studio picked up the film [Ink] for theatrical and home distribution. Double Edge Films pitched the movie directly to independent cinemas and to the DVD, Blu-ray and online distribution by themselves. After the release it became the most downloaded movies in file sharing torrent sites more accurately 400,000 times in a single week and exposed the film to a large audience, leading to higher DVD and Blu-ray sales in return. The independent filmmakers wrote in their newsletter that they had "embraced the piracy" and are "happy Ink is getting unprecedented exposure." : http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1071804/trivia

Re: The Gaiman Principle: piracy is advertising & why Ramen Music encourages sharing

#16

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't like what's happening with IP -- meaning the draconian "enforcement" including especially ever-expanding ownership timeframes. But when I see this argument, I can't help thinking, "Not everyone is an extrovert." I think that goes for both listeners (viewers, etc.) and musicians. I'm not trying to make a big counter-argument. Just this point.

I see your argument and think it's important. However, I think it's probably also true that the existing and historical models for rewarding musical talent exclude some people. The question then becomes, which models are better overall and less exclusive. On the whole I'm not convinced that there is much value in retaining the horribly exploitive traditional model of the mega-powerful recording studio.

No, I'm not arguing for the corrupt "record company" model. A model that, actually, appears to me to be propelled in good part by psychopathic (in the clinical sense), type A and often extroverted personalities.

I just don't want to see such ideas become another form of discrimination against introverts. In many fields, introverts end up being placed at some disadvantage by extroverts who argue that they should simply "suck it up" and "put themselves out there".

Ultimately, I guess it's "survival of the fittest". In my perspective, however, too much of such attitude makes for an unhealthy society. (At which point, we have to get pissed enough to (meet and organize on Facebook, and) rise up and kill all the lawyers, etc., etc. ;-)

Post reply on HN