Live data from Hacker News

Wildlife is reclaiming Yosemite National Park

latimes.com

51–60 of 237 posts

Re: Wildlife is reclaiming Yosemite National Park

#51

> This month is typically a busy month in Yosemite: Of the almost 4.6 million tourists that visited the valley in 2019, about 308,000 came during April. "This month is typically a busy one: less than 1/12th of the number of annual visitors." ️

I like the absolute numbers. "Less than 1/12" lacks important information: less than xx of what?

Re: Wildlife is reclaiming Yosemite National Park

#52
post #27
post #14

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Me too. This is the reason I absolutely don't want to see airlines or airframe manufacturers bailed out. That industry needs to shrink. If that means fewer flights available and higher prices in the future, that's a net positive for the planet as people will have to be more selective about travel. https://www.biologicaldiversity.org/programs/climate_law_ins...

"If that means fewer flights available and higher prices in the future, that's a net positive for the planet as people will have to be more selective about travel." I've lurked near daily on HN for over five years - and this is the unfortunate comment I finally feel the need to make an account to reply to. I presume you're living in the U.S. based on your comment. I too live in the U.S., with severely debilitating he…

I'd love to see cheap slower travel available. Bring back the blimps! :-)

Re: Wildlife is reclaiming Yosemite National Park

#53

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Unfortunately, the best solution is for you to move to a more densely populated area. Not necessarily to a mega-expensive city—although we should make those more accessible too—but somewhere close enough that you don't need air travel to get treatment. And there should be social programs that can make this financially possible. It would totally suck for you, I realize that. Unfortunately, our society simply cannot co…

There are many large cities in the Midwest. Flying to California/Massachusetts implies that the problem is a rare disease, not that it's a population density issue.

Yeah, and so that needs to be a consideration in where GP chooses to live. I realize I'm asking them to upend their entire life, but I don't know what else to do. The status quo simply isn't an option.

Re: Wildlife is reclaiming Yosemite National Park

#54
post #30

It's nice to know that the earth starts to heal so quickly after humans are gone. Although by the time we are actually gone we might make it uninhabitable for other life too.

Philosophical question: if humans are gone, does it really matter what happens to the earth?

I don't know. Does anything really matter at all even when you are alive?

Re: Wildlife is reclaiming Yosemite National Park

#55
post #42
post #38

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm truly sorry to hear about your health issues and the lack of resources available to you. Of course I would like to see better healthcare available to everyone as well. Can't we focus our attention on making healthcare (even specialized treatments like yours) more accessible and affordable, instead of artificially propping up a massively wasteful industry in perpetuity?

How would we make specialized healthcare more locally accessible? By flying specialist doctors and equipment in from the coasts when needed?

Many solutions here:

1. Accept that a tiny portion of our population has extremely rare diseases (true by definition of rare disease lol), and that some portion of our socialized healthcare system involves flying the doctors to this population, or vice versa

2. Dump funding into telehealth solutions, including robotics.

Re: Wildlife is reclaiming Yosemite National Park

#56
post #14

I hope this inspires our generation. I hope we remember that the way things were recently aren’t they way have to be, or the way things naturally are. We need more pollution controls, clean power, and less driving. I also think we need to reduce how many people visit certain places as the harsh reality is that impact is clearly related to visits. It will mean a shared sacrifice but a healthier planet. Hopefully limit…

Me too. This is the reason I absolutely don't want to see airlines or airframe manufacturers bailed out. That industry needs to shrink. If that means fewer flights available and higher prices in the future, that's a net positive for the planet as people will have to be more selective about travel. https://www.biologicaldiversity.org/programs/climate_law_ins...

I respectfully disagree that airframe manufacturers should not be bailed out.

Airframe manufacturer definitely should be preserved and not allowed to wither away. That kind of engineering/institutional knowledge should be preserved and developed.

For the sake our environment, I think COMMUTING to office work should become the norm.

Transportation (including commuting) is the country's second biggest source of carbon emissions, after the electricity sector. Both are far greater source of carbon emission than airline travel.

https://www.worldwildlife.org/magazine/issues/summer-2017/ar...

Re: Wildlife is reclaiming Yosemite National Park

#57

Flagged for misleading click-bait stupidity in the headline. The bear population cannot have quadrupled in a month since the shutdown as the title implies: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bear#Reproduction_and_developm...

Did you read the article? They didn't say bear reproduction; they said population. They are just moving back into Yosemite and being more visible.

> “It’s not like they aren’t usually here,” he said of the bears, bobcats and coyotes that he and other employees now see congregating outside their cabins and apartments. “It’s that they usually hang back at the edges, or move in the shadows.”

Re: Wildlife is reclaiming Yosemite National Park

#58

> This month is typically a busy month in Yosemite: Of the almost 4.6 million tourists that visited the valley in 2019, about 308,000 came during April. "This month is typically a busy one: less than 1/12th of the number of annual visitors." ️

I like the absolute numbers. "Less than 1/12" lacks important information: less than xx of what?

I think the point is how can April be a busy month when it gets less than the naive expected number just from averages.
Post reply on HN