Colornames.org – A collaborative effort to name all 16.7M colors
141–150 of 237 posts
Re: Colornames.org – A collaborative effort to name all 16.7M colors
#142-- Funes the Memorious, Borges
Re: Colornames.org – A collaborative effort to name all 16.7M colors
#143"Later he applied his extravagant principle to the other numbers. In place of seven thousand thirteen, he would say (for example) Maximo Perez; in place of seven thousand fourteen, The Train; other numbers were Luis Melian Lafinur, Olimar, Brimstone, Clubs, The Whale, Gas, The Cauldron, Napoleon, Agustin de Vedia. In lieu of five hundred, he would say nine. Each word had a particular sign, a species of mark; the last…
Re: Colornames.org – A collaborative effort to name all 16.7M colors
#144There is zero indication on the whole site as to who is responsible for this.
There seems to be no privacy statement.
The registrar is anonymized.
The chances of this being a cutesy email phishing site are VERY HIGH
Re: Colornames.org – A collaborative effort to name all 16.7M colors
#145Re: Colornames.org – A collaborative effort to name all 16.7M colors
#146A few of my favorites so far: Screaming Grey: #AAAAAA It's Still Basically Black: #000001 Nice: #696969 (lol) These would make for some great candidates: https://colors.lol/ ;)
I have a handful I'd nominate as "lazy programmer" colors that I think are useful as placeholders but aren't as horrid as #FF00FF etc: blue #aabbdd green #aaddbb purple #bbaadd pink #ddaabb orange #ddbbaa (I usually end up using #bbddaa as well but it's just a different shade of green)
Re: Colornames.org – A collaborative effort to name all 16.7M colors
#147WARNING There is zero indication on the whole site as to who is responsible for this. There seems to be no privacy statement. The registrar is anonymized. The chances of this being a cutesy email phishing site are VERY HIGH
The only place where they are asking for e-mail is on the contact form which makes sense.
Re: Colornames.org – A collaborative effort to name all 16.7M colors
#148Earlier quoted context omitted.
I have been searching for something like this for years! Wish it wasn't Firefox-only :( What would it take to get it ported to a better browser? Here's my crack at coloring or syntax-highlighting the parts of english speech for easier analysis, but mine was a manual process: https://github.com/tomhodgins/bil
>What would it take to get it ported to a better browser? It's waiting for review approval on the chrome webstore.
Re: Colornames.org – A collaborative effort to name all 16.7M colors
#149Earlier quoted context omitted.
The entire website is obviously a silly joke. Even if the colours were distinguishable you wouldn't go about naming them in this fashion but in some more systematic fashion
I thought the entire thing was an excuse to have yet another node dependency. const namedColors = require('namedColors'); const chalk = require('chalk'); console.log(chalk.hex(nameColors['Hacker News Orange'])( lol, you just downloaded a 200meg dep for named colors ));
Re: Colornames.org – A collaborative effort to name all 16.7M colors
#150WARNING There is zero indication on the whole site as to who is responsible for this. There seems to be no privacy statement. The registrar is anonymized. The chances of this being a cutesy email phishing site are VERY HIGH