Live data from Hacker News

Colornames.org – A collaborative effort to name all 16.7M colors

colornames.org

121–130 of 237 posts

Re: Colornames.org – A collaborative effort to name all 16.7M colors

#121

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I believe it's 256

It’s 250. There’s also a list of all colors in use, sorted by frequency: https://news.ycombinator.com/topcolors

Nice. I did not know this. I have set mine to #fff2af. I used to manually edit each character and see if it fits for me. It is 480 of 2923 in that list!

Re: Colornames.org – A collaborative effort to name all 16.7M colors

#122
post #7

Very first thing I see is a rule that the names must be non offensive and the second thing I see is the color orange named after Trump. Apparently not a very serious attempt.

People don't like to admit this, but "offensive" is by definition subjective (to whom does this give offense?). Thus, unless you're fairly explicit about who it's not okay to offend, "offensive" is at best vague and at worst weasel-wording.

It is, however, common knowledge that calling that particular person orange is meant as an insult. No need to have a precise definition of "offensive" for cases like that.

Re: Colornames.org – A collaborative effort to name all 16.7M colors

#123
Nice project but I have a couple of questions of the team:

1. How will you deal with bots and griefers since there appears to be no login required?

2. When is a color considered named? More than X votes for the top name? Any final QA to check for profanity, trademarked terms or other malarkey?

Re: Colornames.org – A collaborative effort to name all 16.7M colors

#124
Shameless plug for color-loving people :

Are all verbs blue ?

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/colorify/

It's parsing any webpage, and coloring words based on their Part-Of-Speech tags.

The idea behind is that if we let the computer pre-parse the text for us, it should incur less mental fatigue, and help visualize the structure of sentences therefore improving our reading comprehension.

The question is how universal can we make this color-mapping ?

Re: Colornames.org – A collaborative effort to name all 16.7M colors

#126

Shameless plug for color-loving people : Are all verbs blue ? https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/colorify/ It's parsing any webpage, and coloring words based on their Part-Of-Speech tags. The idea behind is that if we let the computer pre-parse the text for us, it should incur less mental fatigue, and help visualize the structure of sentences therefore improving our reading comprehension. The question is…

I have been searching for something like this for years! Wish it wasn't Firefox-only :( What would it take to get it ported to a better browser?

Here's my crack at coloring or syntax-highlighting the parts of english speech for easier analysis, but mine was a manual process: https://github.com/tomhodgins/bil

Re: Colornames.org – A collaborative effort to name all 16.7M colors

#127

As colour blind (I fall under the umbrella of Deuteranomaly) I must only celebrate this kind of efforts. I should probably know better but if I recall, up to 8-10% of male population can suffer some kind of colour blindness so it's a huge slice of population that can be benefitted from this. Cheers

All humans are colour blind to some degree; as they get older, even more so.

Re: Colornames.org – A collaborative effort to name all 16.7M colors

#128
post #62
post #43

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"can't tell apart" isn't a transitive relation. That is, just because I can't tell A from B and I can't tell B from C doesn't mean I can't tell A from C.

“Has the same name as”, however, is a transitive relation. So, if no two indistinguishable colors have distinct names, and for every pair of colors have a path between them of colors such that adjacent colors in the path are indistinguishable, then all colors would have the same name.

The flaw here is the assumption that colors have a single, well-defined name.
Post reply on HN