Live data from Hacker News

Colornames.org – A collaborative effort to name all 16.7M colors

colornames.org

111–120 of 237 posts

Re: Colornames.org – A collaborative effort to name all 16.7M colors

#111

Earlier quoted context omitted.

May be they should restrict it to 2 or 3 words without punctuation.

If it's 3 non-repeating unordered words, the minimum vocabulary will need to be 256*3 = 768. Realistically you'll need an order of magnitude larger. That's a pretty large vocabulary.

That’s not right. 256 * 255 * 254

Re: Colornames.org – A collaborative effort to name all 16.7M colors

#112
This immediately reminded me of this interactive art installation, wax chromatic, by Alexander Reben: https://areben.com/project/wax-chromatic/

The audience names a color, and the lights change accordingly. I remember attending a talk of his where he briefly mentioned the huge color name mapping he created for this piece!

Re: Colornames.org – A collaborative effort to name all 16.7M colors

#113

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I believe it's 256

I was so happy when I reached that number (or whatever it was) and didn't have to look at the orange bar any more. For anyone looking for a more tasteful topcolor, try d0c8b5. It's just a darker version of the main HN background color, so it's easy on the eyes.

And here I thought it was released for everyone at the point where I apparently hit that number. Is it just me, or is the fact that it's based on karma not clear?

Re: Colornames.org – A collaborative effort to name all 16.7M colors

#114

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I believe it's 256

It’s 250. There’s also a list of all colors in use, sorted by frequency: https://news.ycombinator.com/topcolors

#abcabc is second on HN... "soft foam". Because people like foam, or easy to remember?

Re: Colornames.org – A collaborative effort to name all 16.7M colors

#116
As colour blind (I fall under the umbrella of Deuteranomaly) I must only celebrate this kind of efforts. I should probably know better but if I recall, up to 8-10% of male population can suffer some kind of colour blindness so it's a huge slice of population that can be benefitted from this.

Cheers

Re: Colornames.org – A collaborative effort to name all 16.7M colors

#117
One challenge with this is that the same name will be proposed for similar colors.

For example: https://colornames.org/search/results/?query=+Safety+Orange+

Deciding what to call a color is going to require more than seeing which name for each color gets the most votes. For a set of names to be useful, they need to make sense when taken as a set.

Re: Colornames.org – A collaborative effort to name all 16.7M colors

#119

Added "Hacker News Orange" to the list: https://colornames.org/color/ff6500 I'm struggling to figure out if this is a serious attempt, though.

On my browser, it appears that the top bar of Hacker News is #ff6600. Is there somewhere that #ff6500 is used?

Re: Colornames.org – A collaborative effort to name all 16.7M colors

#120

I'm curious—is there a point to giving two separate names to two colors which are indistinguishable from one another to the human eye? There are zero people in the world who can tell #FF4500 from #FF4501, so aren't they effectively the same color?

I propose that names be considered more like probability distributions. For example the name “red” has a probability distribution that probably peaks in the neighbourhood of #FF0000 but includes a large range of colors; the distribution of the name “crimson” likely has a much narrower distribution. Under this interpretation, and given enough data, one could feasibly extract “the” name for any given colour using a max…

You might expect to hear this, but what you're hinting at was done by xkcd: https://blog.xkcd.com/2010/05/03/color-survey-results/

Particularly, what you're describing is this: http://imgs.xkcd.com/blag/satfaces_map_1024.png :-)

Post reply on HN