Live data from Hacker News

Colornames.org – A collaborative effort to name all 16.7M colors

colornames.org

81–90 of 237 posts

Re: Colornames.org – A collaborative effort to name all 16.7M colors

#81
post #53

I'm still working diligently on counting the grains of sand on the beach closest to me, and hopefully we can pool all of our work together for a final count. As soon as that's done I'll start trying to name all the stars. Colors? I'm tired already.

But you're not giving each one a name. Slacker.

Re: Colornames.org – A collaborative effort to name all 16.7M colors

#82
post #3

A few of my favorites so far: Screaming Grey: #AAAAAA It's Still Basically Black: #000001 Nice: #696969 (lol) These would make for some great candidates: https://colors.lol/ ;)

I have a handful I'd nominate as "lazy programmer" colors that I think are useful as placeholders but aren't as horrid as #FF00FF etc: blue #aabbdd green #aaddbb purple #bbaadd pink #ddaabb orange #ddbbaa (I usually end up using #bbddaa as well but it's just a different shade of green)

Maybe call them Coder”s Blue etc..

Re: Colornames.org – A collaborative effort to name all 16.7M colors

#84

Very first thing I see is a rule that the names must be non offensive and the second thing I see is the color orange named after Trump. Apparently not a very serious attempt.

Trump can be a word meaning “done better”. I trumped you at math.

Re: Colornames.org – A collaborative effort to name all 16.7M colors

#85
post #56

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Any two adjacent colors must either have the same name or different names.

This assumes a color must have only one name. Why not two, or more?

Having more than one name doesn’t change the story, and neither does some colors having no name at all. For each pair of adjacent colors which is indistinguishable to most people, and the two colors must either have the same name (the two sets of names are equal) or different names (the two sets of names have no intersection).

Re: Colornames.org – A collaborative effort to name all 16.7M colors

#86
post #76

I'm curious—is there a point to giving two separate names to two colors which are indistinguishable from one another to the human eye? There are zero people in the world who can tell #FF4500 from #FF4501, so aren't they effectively the same color?

The entire website is obviously a silly joke. Even if the colours were distinguishable you wouldn't go about naming them in this fashion but in some more systematic fashion

I thought the entire thing was an excuse to have yet another node dependency.

    const namedColors = require('namedColors'); 
    const chalk = require('chalk');
    console.log(chalk.hex(nameColors['Hacker News Orange'])(
       lol, you just downloaded a 200meg dep for named colors
    ));

Re: Colornames.org – A collaborative effort to name all 16.7M colors

#87
The vast majority of people are not need to remember ten and more color names, Remembering the 16M names is so impossible that you cann't understand which color does the others tell you indeed mean before you google the name and get the hex values. I think this project makes no sence at all.

Re: Colornames.org – A collaborative effort to name all 16.7M colors

#90
OK. Went down the rabbit hole 20 minutes ago and just surfaced. I love simple time-wasters like this. My contributions include:

Peppermunt

Not quite baby shite

Medical attention required

Hardware store argument blue

Something tells me however that the colour picker that implements this list, while fun, would not be very performant.

Post reply on HN