Live data from Hacker News

Analyzing HN readers' personal blogs

dannysalzman.com

61–70 of 99 posts

Re: Analyzing HN readers' personal blogs

#61
post #58

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There is a difference between acknowledging publicly who you are and doxxing, which I consider to be publicly releasing your phone number and physical address (at least).

>doxxing Where does this strange typo come from?

From the same place as phising, leet etc.

Re: Analyzing HN readers' personal blogs

#62
post #60

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Probably because there isn’t a good free analytics service that is easy to use (no need for self-hosting) and is able to collect the info that one wants. GA is free, and easy.

Piwik is free and does everything GA does. You can self host the analytics dashboard so no 3rd party privacy issues.

[deleted]

Re: Analyzing HN readers' personal blogs

#63

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That’s a fair point! I would have to read HN’s terms of use though. Not sure if that’s allowed or not. I felt good scrapping the comments section since everyone there “opted in “ to share their website to the broader community.

You can take it as read that people who write blog posts do that to share them with the broader community. Could one of you downvoters please explain why you think people would post blog posts if they do not want to share them? I fail to see how that would be possible.

One reason is they don't actually want the "broader" community to see them. More than once I've seen people lament the fact that the "orange site" picked up one of their posts. There are Twitter accounts dedicated to making fun of things people say in the comments here. There are people who wrote scripts that do special things when the referrer to their site is HN.

Re: Analyzing HN readers' personal blogs

#66

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That’s a fair point! I would have to read HN’s terms of use though. Not sure if that’s allowed or not. I felt good scrapping the comments section since everyone there “opted in “ to share their website to the broader community.

You can take it as read that people who write blog posts do that to share them with the broader community. Could one of you downvoters please explain why you think people would post blog posts if they do not want to share them? I fail to see how that would be possible.

Direct personal experience is why I think someone would write a blog post and not have much interest in sharing. I’m not an enthusiastic self promoter. Turning up my lizard brain volume gets in the way of living in ways that I find more fulfilling.

Re: Analyzing HN readers' personal blogs

#67
post #14

Interesting to see the high numbers for GA. A bit of ‘do as I say, not as I do’ going on?

Every time I see a privacy outrage thread over here I think about how many readers/commenters on this site work for advertising/tracking companies or companies whose products include tracking code. (Full disclosure: I don’t.)

And the number of readers who just aren't that bothered (and are even less bothered about getting in to an argument on the internet about it).

Re: Analyzing HN readers' personal blogs

#69
> ended up copy and pasting all of the text from the entire post and then using regex on the command line to spit out a list of URLS.

I had a chuckle. This is how so much data analysis happens in practice. Nothing like the command line for quickly cleaning some data.

Great work!

Post reply on HN